Add this

Friday 25 March 2022

BOOK REVIEW- THE LINE OF MERCY

   

                                 MERCY  HAS  TO  BE  EVOKED,  NOT  DEMANDED 

                              


THE LINE OF MERCY

AUTHOR- TARUN TEJPAL

PUBLISHER- HARPER COLLINS, INDIA

MARCH 2022

   Tarun Tejpal is the Devil's Advocate for the underdog, the counsellor for the damned. His forte is the underbelly- of the government, society, passions, beliefs, long held shibboleths, blind traditions, religious dogmas, the legal fictions that make life comfortable for the elite and the privileged and hell for the others. It takes skill to describe the beautiful, but it requires exceptional talent and artistry to describe the ugly, and Tejpal has that in abundance. THE LINE OF MERCY is a monumental work, crafted by a scalpel not a pen, in which all the ugliness and hypocrisy of our society is laid open with a surgical skill that is both brutal and poetic in its breadth and depth. It does not always make for pleasant reading but then anything that makes one question our comfort zones  rarely does.

   The essence of this book is captured in one line from it, one of the many aphorisms embedded in its formidable 700- odd pages: " Mercy is the line across which live the weak and the defeated." Tejpal focuses his penetrating powers of observation on finding out precisely where this line is drawn and who are the people on either side of it. Is it drawn inside the interrogation room of the police station? In the illusory safety and privacy of the bedroom? On the boundary between the fields of the warring families of two lovers? In the competing predatory instincts of the hardened inmates of a jail? In a courtroom in the space between an amoral lawyer and an indifferent judge? Between a promised "masjid" and a fait accompli "mandir"? Between a brutal truth and a comforting lie? Between a crime and a criminal? Between a god and his worshipper ?

  Tejpal poses this question repeatedly ( he is wise enough not to answer it, that is the reader's burden) and enlarges on it, in Canterbury Tales fashion, by creating a medley of characters residing in the underbelly of India like lice , invisible to most of us privileged in real life,  noticed only when they sting or bite us. The stage for this panoply of actors is a district jail, the default universe for a significant part of our population, the updated version of Dante's Inferno: Abandon Hope, All Ye Who Enter Here.

   This book is our own version of Crime And Punishment, but on a much wider canvas and with the difference that there can be no redemption for the protagonists here. If only to continue the analogy, it could perhaps be more appropriately  titled Alleged Crime And Certain Punishment, for in India it is not necessary for guilt to be proven before inflicting punishment. Tejpal imparts an entirely new meaning to the phrase Justice Is Blind and suggests that perhaps society could be served better if justice was not totally blind but had one eye cocked open. As he puts it: " The angel of justice should be principally blind but should keep peering intermittently from under closed eyelids."

   The cast of characters in the book is simply overwhelming, and Tejpal narrates, with superb insights into the working of human emotions, the route followed by each one of them to the penitentiary. Not unlike the road to hell these roads too are paved, but with the bitumen of social injustice, poverty, illiteracy, rejection, patriarchy, ambition, misdirected passion, lust and plain bad luck. Notwithstanding what their Aadhaar cards may say, the dramatis personae are all rechristened in the cages of their new world, in recognition of their essential characteristics. And so we have Asambhav and Aranya, the eternal lovers whose Wagnerian passion for each other is an epic by itself ; Bichhhoo the triple murderer; Dr. Hagg, whose medications had killed two children. His real name was Damodar Desai but he was renamed because he had a propensity to lose control of his sphincters every time he was beaten up; Peter the Fist, the overlord of the prison wards in recognition of hands the size of watermelons; Godwin, the framed innocent and unloved son of a paranoid father and a mother who sets herself on fire to escape the daily forensic examination of her intimate parts by her husband; Barretto the pimp; Papa the baker; Aslam the sodomiser who also doubles up as the jail barber; Jogen Jabda and Atoum Bumb the dwarf, who began life as runaway kids in a circus; Andha Kanoon, the plumber who beat his wife and her sister to death and was so named because he was turning blind in his cell, Babu the Hindutva fanatic. There are also Google Baba, the inevitable Hitler, Bobo, Singham the cop, Sparkplug who marries his internet love via Skype from the jail. Each one of them is framed in tragi-comic terms in order to  render the underlying pathos more acceptable.

   It is a fascinating cast of characters, which more or less covers the mofussil world of India. Between them they encompass all the essential passions of mankind: love, jealousy, greed, paranoia, hate, family feuds, anger, power. They are cleverly chosen and constructed by Tejpal because they also reflect the social maladies and fissures that underpin our much vaunted civilisation and culture. As the author explains: "The social contract between humans everywhere is based on the commonwealth of lies. The lies of justice and equality. The lies of nationalism and common purchase." The lies that ensure our jails will always be over populated with the guilty and the presumed guilty, the weak and the defenceless, the illiterate and the barely literate, the weirdo and the addict - fodder for policemen, wardens, lawyers and judges.

   But where this book stands out in solitary splendour is in its practical contribution to Indian penology- the study of crime and punishment and of prison management. What Tejpal focuses on, however, is not  the hardware but the software: not the administrative nitty gritty of prison management but the psychology and pathology that drives all those who live within its fetid walls. For the prison is a world alien to most of us, hidden away from our refined sensibilities. Tejpal lays it bare for us, from the inside out, like no Law Commission or Parliamentary Committee has ever done. It is a singular achievement which, to the best of my knowledge, has no parallel in Indian writing, English or any other language. Through the phenomenal cast of characters we learn of the caste system in prisons, hierarchies based not on the Vedas but on the heinousness of the crime, seniority of incarceration, propensity for violence, complicity with the jailors. We learn of the code of omerta and the protocols of violence. We learn how, even in this pit of despondence, there can be a rekindling of hope, love, religion. We see how the stoicism of Hindu philosophy can be relevant here when all other beliefs are shattered. The rules which govern the world outside also apply here, with the added sanction of permitted violence. There are fixers here, smuggling, pornography, bribery, beatings, despair, the paradoxical abandonment of hope along with the constant search for it in every arriving letter, Whatsapp message, a delayed bail hearing. You can demand justice here, says the author, but you cannot demand mercy. You have to learn to evoke it. You have to find out for yourself where the line of mercy is drawn, and then hope that you are on the right side of it.

   The book is strung together with individual stories but these stories are not important in themselves. What is important is the world they construct, their raw material transmuted, with consummate skill, into a universe of the damned. The prison is the "chakravyuh" which one can enter with ease but can exit only as a corpse or a broken being or a serial criminal. Equally important are the uncomfortable questions the author poses- to the government, to society, to lawyers and judges, to the "thekedars" of religion, to us as individuals. But it is dangerous to answer them, for we shall stand exposed if we do. 

  Tejpal's insights are as incisive as they are eclectic, for he delves into the pathology of justice, religions, communalism, marriage, political posturing and the many other legal fictions we live by. Where he has few equals, however, is in his clinical ability to put the idea and practice of love under a microscope and to dissect its various constituents. He is the taxidermist of passion. He can identify the parts that elevate and those that corrupt love. He casts away the latter like so much dross and leaves you with the pure essence of love, a noble trophy, as the ultimate prize. Sadly, however, as this book shows, this trophy is beyond the reach of most of us. But it is a worthy if romantic goal to aspire to for, as Browning writes: One's reach must exceed one's grasp, or what's a heaven for? This is what makes a hopeless romantic, and the author for all his scathing cynicism and brutal exposition, is one such romantic at heart.                                                       Tejpal is as much of an unrecognized philosopher as he is a novelist, his insights into the labyrinthine corridors of human character, individual and collective, are deep and illuminating. But they do not engender hope. If this book had a sub-title it would have to be: Homo homini lupis est- Man is wolf to man. 

8 comments:

  1. A very well written review. No one who Tejpal well can say that he is not brilliant. And a brilliant person demands a brilliant review.
    The other thing I welcome is that Avay is diversifying his writing to include book reviews and quite likely other genres. All the best.

    ( Reproduced comment by Harsh Gupta, IAS Retd. and former Chief Secretary of Himachal Pradesh.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. A superb review that easily outstrips the novel for which it was written.

    I have no literary antecedent, nor am I sufficiently erudite to gauge the scope and subtlety of a book. Tarun Tejpal was forgotten by me and his name disgorged memories of an explosive sting journalist who was himself stung for a sex crime he had supposedly committed, till he was exonerated by the court last year. But the review urged - no, compelled - me to read the preview of “The Line of Mercy” for I thought, if the book has garnered such depth of appreciation from Avay Shukla in a style so precisely curated and laid before the reader - like a table set for fine dining - well then it must indeed be a magnificient literary feast.

    I apologise profusely for being repulsed. It is not my intent to disparage the genre or the writer.

    The sheer starkness with which the hopelessness is depicted through the wretched lives of the characters makes my hair stand and mind go blunt. What I had anticipated upon reading Avay Shukla's commendation as he unravels textures of the book, was akin to a biryani resplendent in its layers that unveil when the servings are offered. What the preview portrays is the horrendous and wrenching variety of crimes committed by the detainees who live within the walls of the penitentiary - every act being more hideous and loathsome than the other. And the ruthless thrashings devoid of reason, dished out to an inch of killing the recipient who always swears blamelessness. The ecosystem inside is nothing that can remotely be imagined; it stupefies and sends shivers down the reader. If “The Line of Mercy” is being hailed in the same breath as the acclaimed novel “Crime and Punishment”, then in my utterly low but firm opinion, its preview compels one to close it hurriedly owing to its portrayal of the grisly, the violent, the macabre. Not because one has not the stomach to digest these, but because there appears neither direction nor reason for such toxins to be released into the reader.

    Your review Sir, is vastly different and meaningful. Perhaps you have had the opportunity of an advance read of the full book. Yet it amazes me as to how you endured the relentless onslaught of gruesomeness upon your faculties for over 700 pages and stayed focussed. Your fulsomeness of praise is excellently modulated and worded beautifully. It was precisely that, that enticed me to search for the preview and peruse it, only to be shocked more and more. It felt as if one was entering deeper and deeper into a morass of inhumaneness from which there was no exit, no redemption, just condemnation. The protagonists are but flotsam in the mire of the penal system - unwanted, uncared, cursed to meet Death as their only liberator. Perhaps Tarun Tejpal wished to bring out the depression, the futility of crime and criminal jurisprudence in the Indian context as you suggest. To me the exaltation of the exploitative, the ghastly, the cruel is not the right excavator with which to exhume these existences in society.

    Your essay is a must-read if this book has to find space in the shelves of the literati. Your brilliant construction of the essence - unfolded slowly, systematically, and in language sublime is the real elevator, far ahead of the actual stuff. May I suggest you put a table alongside Tarun Tejpal at the release; I wager the price of one copy that you will garner far more autograph seekers than the author. And the cash registers will ring for him like they did after the Prime Minister lauded the Kashmir Files.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your very eloquent revulsion, Mr Patankar, is in itself a tribute and vindication of the book. To be fair to art, an artist should not be judged by the subject he chooses but by his execution and the skill with which he paints, in words or in colours. If an artist can stir thought or feelings- the stronger the better- his job is done.It is my considered view that Tejpal has succeeded in doing so in ample measure. A mirror is not responsible for what it reflects, whether it be beauty or ugliness.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Have you just discovered prison life and "beatings"?( from the age of Robert Browning).
      Please do read killing field by Lee Child.
      Dickensian expositions as writing for the retired IAS!
      Just read Lee Child to know the world has moved on from the days of "essays"
      A gritty story on how to move beyond mercy pity etc to actually solve and put an end to things.
      British writer,in American can do tales!





      Delete
    2. Dear Unknown...
      Perhaps you refer to the book "Killing Floor" by Lee Child, written sometime in 1997, a fictional narration, part of the Jack Reacher series.
      Or are you alluding to the movie "The Killing Fields" - a singular masterpiece directed by Rolland Joffe' in 1984 or 85 - based on a true story highlighting the atrocities of the Khmer Rouge regime in Cambodia.
      Whichever you pick, there appears little reason to denigrate as you seem to, because it lowers the course of the debate which has entirely to do with the book being reviewed than either of our personal views on Indian crime, criminality and correction.
      May I respectfully suggest Sir, that you refrain from these discourtesies.
      Unless I am hopelessly obtuse in not catching your drift, in which case I must offer you an apology.

      Delete
  4. I am pushing back at the over-horrification the author leans on as he pilots his project. I detect an overdose of sordid elements in his construct, which I find noisome.
    If the book is a fictional narration of prison life in India as imagined by the author, then I reserve the right to feel repulsed by his magnified depiction of nothing but the morbid.
    If it is his attempt to illuminate real life within Indian reformatories, then he is circumscribed and selective in his reflection of what is an ugly but vast subject. This mirror does not throw out a correct image, I lament.
    Your essay however, is far more compendious in its analysis and brilliant in its dissection.
    The review exceeds the preview I maintain.
    Your rebuttal to me is a precise incision inflicted in this jousting duel, and Tarun Tejpal is well protected as long as he has Sir Avay as his knight to ensure nobody transgresses the line of his mercy, the way I have.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr. Patankar, I doff my Himachali cap at you, for the sheer felicity of your writing. I look forward to your weekly comments on my blogs, and I am never disappointed ! They arrive with the certainty of the sunrise every morning, though occasionally the cloud cover gives me pause for thought and wishing I had the acumen of our Supreme Leader whose vision can penetrate even the clouds of war, or a surgical strike, as the occasion demands! Keep your quiver full, sir.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only way to to "Touche'" you Sir, is to first slosh your insides with single malt and ensure the warmth of the elixir has lightened you suitably. The rest is procedural...for which the inimitable Navjot Sidhu has kept a Sidhuism ready...but I am far too heightened in my dizziness from your compliment to remember it for now....!!
      Thank you very much and I wait for your next hebdomadal strike.

      Delete