Any game, or contract, is based on and pre-supposes mutually accepted rules which govern, and bind, the participants. Democracy is one such contract, the ultimate social contract, in which the citizens (the ruled) give up their individual powers to the elected government (the ruler) in return for the protection of their rights, freedoms and the pursuit of happiness in their own individual ways. In India so far, for the last 75 years, this contract has held together though it has come under strain at many times. The credit for this goes to enlightened leadership and constitutional institutions that have usually worked, notwithstanding some blips and glitches.
But over the last decade or so the authoritarian, unilateral, anti-federal, non-accountable governance style of the NDA government has put this contract under immense strain, and on the 20th of July it has come to near breaking point. The impetus behind it is the Modi government's panaroia about any kind of protest or opposition to its policies and diktats- it views them as challenges, and not as opportunities to introspect and/or self-correct. This happened with the Assam NRC, CAA, Covid, Manipur, Article 370 and Kashmir, SIR, the Ken_Betwa protests. But on the 20th of July, this paranoia reached new heights (or lows) when the full might of the state was unleashed on young students, and blood was spilt on the streets of Delhi, all over a protest against India's rancid and corrupt examinations system.
By this unjustifed violence the government has broken the contract with its citizens. Sovereign violence is to be used against enemies of the state, and not against its own children. A government which cannot differentiate between the two has finally exposed its fascist, illiberal, intolerant and dictatorial nature, and the Jantar Mantar protests have shown it in all its ugly nakedness. Despite the prostitution of the darbari media and TV channels, the internet and Youtube have brought this to the doors of every Indian, and support for the students is only growing.
The unkindest cut of all (to the spirit of democracy)has been inflicted by none other than the Chief Justice of India himself, Justice Suryakant. Perhaps this should have been expected, for it was his earlier intemperate remark about cockroaches that has led to this spiral of events in the first place. Responding to a PIL by a lawyer asking for an inquiry into the police excesses of 20th July, the CJI peremptorily dismissed it with the observation that he did not have the time to watch videos (of the police violence on protesters). This was a remark callous and unbecoming of a person appointed to protect the constitutional rights of citizens. He was not being petitioned to watch a Kangana Ranaut movie, but to view the documented evidence of unlawful violence on unarmed teenagers, to seek answers from the government on questions that screamed out for answers: Who were the "brownshirts", masked and in civvies, who were allowed to beat up students with lathis and total impunity with the police watching? How did a truck laden with stones find its way to the high security Jantar Mantar area and who brought it? Why were peacefully marching students beaten up brutally without any provocation? Why did the policemen take off their name badges? What is the identity of the jawan who is seen ramming his baton between a young girl's legs even as she is walking away? What is the name of the DCP who walks up to one young girl and slaps her in the face for no reason at all? Where is the footage of protesters throwing stones and beating up policemen, as alleged by the government? Were illegal lethal weapons such as pellet guns, taser (electrically charged) batons and nail studded lathis used against the students? Who are the goons, in plainclothes, seen throwing stones and wrecking cars? Was there a deliberate attempt to discredit the protesters and provoke violence?
The refusal of the CJI to entertain this petition and seek answers to the questions above has thrown an obfuscatory veil over the events of 20th July not dissimilar to the white sheet used to cover the abduction of Sonam Wangchuk from Jantar Mantar by the same police. In contrast, however, credit must be given to the justices of the Delhi High Court who, on 22nd July, have admitted a similar petition and have issued notice to the government and the Delhi police (though it demanded an urgent hearing and not a four week notice).
This is a moment of inflection for the entire non-NDA opposition. They have to live up to it, which at the moment they do not appear to be doing. They cannot plough their own individual furrows, headed for nowhere, but must come together to offer counsel and guidance to these gallant students who are full of passion and sincerity but lack the experience of conducting long-drawn out protests. At the moment there is no sign of such a concerted action on the part of these parties, each of whom is trying to take credit and control of this movement. The Congress wants the agitation to come under its umbrella, the AAP feels this right is theirs as the legal heirs of the Anna movement, the SP and UBT Shiv Sena seem to have some reservations, the TMC is supportive but distant, the DMK will not sup with the Congress, even Sonam Wangchuk has called off his fast today, a not unexpected development since he had started blowing hot and cold of late (in my view he has probably struck a deal with the government about his personal future in Ladakh. In any case, he has now become irrelevant to the movement).
The entire Opposition should realise (as these youngsters have) that the rules of the game have changed. The government will not abide by its part of the contract: it will not conduct fair elections, it has suborned all agencies of governance, it has defenestrated all constitutional institutions, it has rendered the entire judiciary submissive, it has bought over the media, it has made the use of sovereign violence its greatest persuader, it refuses to be held accountable. With these rules the Opposition has become superfluous, it can never win an election or preserve even a semblance of democracy in the country. It can no longer wage a struggle in Parliament, or the Election Commission or the Supreme Court- these institutions have been hollowed out and can no longer serve the purpose for which they were created. It can no longer fight a fair electoral contest- the game now has to change to one of resistance in the public arena- in Jantar Mantar, Parade Grounds, Azad Maidan, Freedom Park, Ramlila Maidan, Swami Sivavananda Salai, Dharna Chowk, Gandhi Maidan. The students are already there, and doing a fine job; it is the responsibility of the main opposition parties to join them there. Credit can be apportioned or shared when the monster has been vanquished.
"There is a tide in the affairs of men, which, taken at the flood leads on to fortune..." Rahul Gandhi has no doubt read this quote from Shakespeare, he now needs to embrace it. The students at Jantar Mantar have created this tide, it is now for him to rally the other Opposition parties, national and regional, to seize the moment. The game has changed, and playing by the BJP's new rules will get them nowhere. The Empire has already begin to strike back, using its bottomless bag of tricks: another 20 companies of CRPF have reportedly been flown in to Delhi, the Police Commissioner has been given powers under NSA to detain people for 12 months without trial, it has been stated that passports of detained protesters will be cancelled, a petition has been filed in the Delhi High Court seeking an NIA investigation into the funding of the CJP (Cockroach Janata Party) protests. More can be expected: curbs on YouTube channels on their reporting, profiling of protesters and visits to their parents, debarring them from admissions or sitting for examinations. It is not possible to resist the resources of a modern state for very long. Very soon the tide will begin to turn, and then the opportunity will have been lost - for ever.
Spot on๐๐ผ. It is apparent that the Home Ministry, while drawing the agitating students into 'dialogue', is preparing for an assault to physically dismantle the agitation.
ReplyDeleteMasters of hoodwinking that the fascists are, they wouldn't allow reason or restraint to prevail or show the elementary decency by appearing to be amenable to the most basic principle of democracy - of being accountable to the people. Idiocy and arrogance which often ride together, when mixed with stubbornness, will only produce chaos. It takes statemen to to rise to the situation before us. & if even one such leader was part of the pack, the current scenario would not have emerged in the first place.
As someone said, beware of a young man with a new idea.
ReplyDeleteHas its time come now?
Right on the ball!
ReplyDeleteWhat's beautiful is that the momentum in the upsurge is building up organically and not being fueled from outside.
ReplyDeleteOur generation has messed it up, it is now for this younger lot to bring the ship back to even keel. More power to them! It is they who will rid this country of the saffron scum and bring back the nation we were born into.
If this is peaceful agitation then I am Qeen of Sheeba.Being anti BJP or anti -Modi is okay but crossing across border to anti national / collaboration with them with ulterior motive is treason and must be dealt accordingly..Nationalism is simple. The nation above else .The sanctity, sovereignty and security of nation is above all else.The govt, regardless of who is in power, represent the nervous system of republic- a Republic that must survive, that must thrive, that must be inviolable, impregnable and indomitable. Fortress for its children.The Fortress must withstand- not hubris, like this as authored above, a subjective views,product of Mussoorie Academy.
ReplyDeleteMissing the point .
DeleteVery well said Bharti and I applaud your conviction to stick to your stand at a time when the general sentiment is with the youth movement. It is thanks to you and people like you who continue to support this govt that we are well on our way to becoming VikSHIT Bharat.
DeleteBharti, I am proud to be a product of the Mussoorie academy, and in case you haven't figured it out yet, a view is always subjective-that's the whole idea of having a view. Unless, of course, it's one like your's- copy-pasted from the RSS playbook. You're right about one thing, however: the nation IS above all else. And in case your addled mind hasn't got it yet, nation means its citizens-ALL it citizens including students, minorities, farmers, the marginalised, not just the politicians, the privileged and fat cats. Mr. Modi and his hangers on are learning it the hard way; you will too, in due course. In the meantime, have a good time in Sheeba.
ReplyDeleteWell said, Sir
Deletewell said ,Sir
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBharti, I think that's a very narrow way of looking at a democracy. Nationalism isn't synonymous with supporting the government of the day. The nation is its people, its Constitution, and its institutions—not just the executive.
ReplyDeleteCalling dissent, protest, or criticism "anti-national" without evidence of actual collaboration with hostile forces only weakens democratic discourse. Treason is a serious legal accusation, not a label to be applied to political opponents.
A confident nation doesn't fear criticism; it responds to it. Holding the government accountable is not the opposite of loving one's country—it is often an expression of that commitment. Patriotism demands that we defend both national security and democratic freedoms. Sacrificing one in the name of the other ultimately weakens both.
The Education Minister finally resigned, something he could have done a few days ago :).
Students showed the mettle , when most of the citizens prefer being andhbhakts or indifferent .
ReplyDeleteGreat analysis. Spot on with your assessment that the election process has been rendered irrelevant. The opposition has been missing the bus since 2016 & will continue to do so. However, the big, big game changer is that the students have changed the rules of engagement. Humour, irony & satire along with an enjoy the process attitude which outfoxed both the cops & the ponderous govt. Pradhan has resigned & Prahlad Joshi has taken over. A political "pro" with no claim to education management experience or knowledge. The king is dead. Long live the king. Everything changes, yet nothing changes & they say change is the only constant. Full marks to our young student protesters. ero for our politicians. The next good fight, ethenol. Let's start tilting at that windmill now taxi & transport unions.
ReplyDeleteSo well put together. For this regime any and every time a protest happens it's alleged to be foreign funded to a group of terrorists and what have you. I'm glad there are people like you who dare to publish their viewpoint.
ReplyDeleteIt is disheartening to read Avay Shukla’s contemptuous dismissal of Sonam Wangchuk. He appears unable to acknowledge the moral fibre of the man, despite him having undertaken a fast of 26 continuous days for the cause he espoused.
ReplyDeleteSonam Wangchuk was transactionalised by every player at the table as soon as he was removed from the protesting site.
The BJP ruling regime demonetised him by keeping him isolated under the optics of hospitalisation. The Congress reduced him to small change by accusing him of making a clandestine deal with the government towards his cause of Ladakh. The CJP in its exultation forgot him as their principal negotiator who had kept the spotlight focussed upon the movement for a month. The Page 3 folk who were standing in line to be clicked with him till he was removed, displayed why they have amnesic minds and a present tense existence. And Avay Shukla, by publishing his blog a day earlier than the events changed the narrative, broadsided Sonam Wangchuk with his parenthetical expulsion.
The foreground was altered because Wangchuk broke that fast out of the spotlight’s glare, upon extracting an assurance from the government of no further coercive suppression of the protesters like the one of 20th July. Those who were imploring him to end it while he was at the site, suddenly found it unacceptable that he did so, alone in a hospital ward.
Avay Shukla should have included Sonam Wangchuk in a laudatory paragraph rather than consign him to a dismissive parenthesis, regardless of the day of release of his blog. Perhaps his customary perspicacity yielded to the impatience of the unfolding events.
Your conclusions are way off the mark, Mr Patankar. All of us have had the highest respect for Wangchuk's integrity and courage, and for his contribution to the CJP movement: in fact it was his fast that galvanized the protest and gave it a renewed lease of life. We were also in favour of his terminating his fast, primarily because of his health issues. I was a signatory to the appeal from my group (the Constitution Conduct Group) to him for ending the fast. The disappointment was with the manner in which he did so:
ReplyDelete* He ended the fast unilaterally without any consultation with, or information to, the CCG. He should have done so, considering he was an integral part of their movement.
* He abandoned the main demand- the resignation of Pradhan-unilaterally, thus causing embarassment to the others, and giving the govt. a talking point when it was floundering.
* By doing so in the presence of two BJP Ministers only, and even accepting a glass of water from them, he gave the impression of conceding to the govt. How much better, and symbolically significant, it would have been had he done so by accepting a glass from one of the students from Jantar Mantar. This gesture would have unequivocally conveyed that he was ending his fast in response to THEIR appeals and not the govt's pressure.
* This error of judgment instantly created a trust deficit between him and the CJP/ protesters, which persists to this day because the Latter have now disassociated themselves form him. Wangchuk has now stated that he is going back to Ladakh. This is a profound loss for the movement itself. It is tragic that a person of Wangchuk's moral stature is no longer part of this youth movement, and that to some extent there is now a trust deficit between him and the protesting students. The only gainer is the govt. and the BJP.
It is unconvincing that the CCG’s indignation stems mainly from Sonam Wangchuk ending his fast alone, away from the protest site, and in the presence of government representatives. He did so while held under coerced isolation, cut off from all communication, and after extracting two of the three original demands. The third demand — the resignation of the Education Minister — was accepted by the government the very next day. The sequence of the outcomes is insufficient for the CCG not to clear him of serious fault. Such reading reduces a 26-day fast that extracted concrete concessions, into a dispute over the timing and appearance of its conclusion. Those who treat the manner of the break as more consequential than its achieved results, display a curious opacity to the actual shift of power happening at that moment.
ReplyDeleteThe government gained no meaningful leverage from Wangchuk’s kidnapped hospitalisation or from the restricted negotiations conducted under its control. After the police violence of 20th July, the order of priority had shifted. The immediate safety of the protesting students, their families and their property correctly became the focal concern. Continuing an indefinite fast under those conditions risked further escalation of hardening irreversibility. Bringing the talks to a close with tangible assurances was a rational response, not a capitulation as seen parochially by most.
Finally, it made complete sense for Wangchuk to return to his hometown on discharge. The protesters had already signalled their dissociation from him, and the optics of that rupture were plain. His role in giving the movement national eye sight and moral vector was fulfilled. What follows hereafter belongs to the CJP, the Opposition and the Executive. The CCG cannot reasonably expect him to relocate to Delhi and remain available permanently towards education reform.
A quiet, dignified exit is as Gandhian as a quiet, dignified squat.
It's their nemesis. All I hope is that the youngsters don't get caught in the deceptive quagmire of the powerful sharks .
ReplyDelete