THE VANDE BHARAT PARADOX
The Vande Bharat stable of trains is the pride of the Indian railways, and deservedly so. Their coaches are state of the art, comprising the best in the world in technology and comfort, rivalling the airlines at a fraction of the cost. Each set of 16 coaches costs about Rs. 130 crores, ten times the cost of an average train; the railways run 75 pairs of these trains currently, but plan to raise it to 4500 by 2047 . But the Vande Bharat has an Achilles heel-designed to run at 200 kms/hour, its average speed is only 76/hour, no better than the Rajdhani or the Shatabdi of much more ancient vintage, negating its very purpose and expenditure. Outdated track and signals technology have simply not kept pace with the more modern rolling stock, poor maintenance and anti-collision systems, overloaded train schedules bedevil the railway system. Proof of this lies in the statistics: in the eleven years ending 2023 there were 678 train crashes, resulting in 1061 deaths (ref National Crime Records Bureau). If one were to quantify all accidents such as people falling off trains or walking on the tracks or mishaps at railway crossings etc. the figure for just 2023 is a mind boggling 24678 accidents and 21835 deaths. This is the Vande Bharat Paradox- the attempt to impose a modern superstructure on a crumbling infrastructure without proper preparation or 360* planning, driven by misplaced priorities and a publicity-seeking paranoia. And this is not peculiar to the railways alone but pervades all our development parameters and sectors.
Take our highways. At 146,204 kms India has one of the largest networks of National Highways in the world, and this is expanding at 45 kms per day, having increased by 60% since 2015. Mr. Gadkari boasts that by 2030 we will rival the USA. In length maybe, but not in quality, for the Vande Bharat paradox is at play here too. The groundwork for such a rapid expansion has not been done: the roads are of poor quality, the cars and drivers not suited for high-speed expressways, and enforcement is wanting. The proof, again, lies in the statistics. There were 172000 deaths in accidents in 2024-25, with an astonishing AGR of 9.8%. We record 2247 deaths per million vehicles, as against 814 for China and 141 for the USA: our highways are corridors of death, not just transportation. The reason? Development of associated but essential hard and soft infrastructure has not kept pace with the physical construction of roads- we are grossly deficient in road designs and engineering, timely maintenance, enforcement of road discipline, international level road and traffic signages, efficient highway patrol systems, availability of medical and trauma centers to provide the golden hour treatment for accident victims, the licensing regimes are riddled with corruption. As in the case of the railways, we have put the cart before the horse here too.
Next, consider our education eco-system. Here again the statistics are impressive- a superstructure of 18000 colleges and 800 universities, churning out 15 million graduates every year, including 1.50 million engineers and 180000 doctors. Enough, one would think, to power us strongly to developed nation status. But look closely and one finds the Vande Bharat paradox playing out here too. For barely 40% of these youngsters are employable, such is the quality of our primary and higher education, thanks to poor regulation, corruption in the selection of teachers, persistent paper leaks, governments abdicating their responsibility and out-sourcing education to profiteering corporates. The proof is not far away here either: the global QS World University Rankings (2026) saw all but one of India's Top Ten educational institutes slide sharply in their ranks; IIT Bombay from 48 to 71, IIT Delhi from 44 to 59.
And worse is to come, for the BJP govt. at the center has an antediluvion concept of education, and is sparing no effort at hollowing out the very foundations of our education system. It is turning our Universities from being centers of inquiry to centers of strait-jacketed conformism, repression and ideological brain-washing. Vice Chancellors and Directors (of IIMs and IITs) are chosen on the basis of loyalty and ideological compatibility, not scholarship or administrative experience, and their primary task is to crush the spirit of inquiry; in JNU alone, more than 500 cases have been filed in the Delhi High Court by students and faculty against such high-handedness.
Even worse is the manner in which the UGC and NCERT are mutilating syllabi for colleges and schools and embedding in them an unscientific and backward-looking political ideology. So the Mughals are largely deleted from history books, secularism and federalism as subjects from text books, Darwin's Theory of Evolution and the Periodic Tables are expunged from Class 10 textbooks. This is an institutionalizing of scientific illiteracy. A generation of "qualified quacks" is being created by integrating modern, science based medicine with traditional systems and allowing homeopaths to practice modern pharmacology. In short, the very scientific temper which ensures real development is being eroded from under our educational institutions. The gleaming buildings are being hollowed out from within and the damage will be felt years down the line.
The Vande Bharat paradox pervades other areas of "development too, where all is not what it seems and contradictions are all too apparent: the fourth largest economy in the world but with 300 million in poverty and free rations for 800 million , glitzy metros that have the highest pollution levels in the world, the Umar Khalid paradox where a young scholar is neither tried nor convicted but continues to languish in jail for 5 years, the GDP paradox where, though the Govt. says we are growing at 7% or 8%, the IMF cautions that the figures are doctored, the Crime and Reward paradox where the crime is proved but the criminal is allowed to retain the proceeds of the crime. The list is endless We are living in an imaginary world where paradoxes reign supreme. To put it in the words of my late English teacher, Prof. P.Lal: We are what we think, having become what we thought. The institutionalization of delusion.
Name game is an Old slogan of RSS,Jan Sangh and now BJP.
ReplyDeleteMy ancestors anticipated all this as early as in the 70's. Even the "best" of political decisions of the Congress were too contrary and substandard to our notion of Indo-European civilisational standards. We are happy that my Nani Ji took the decision of investing in Greece, Persia and Uzbekistan five decades ago. None of these nations could be deemed as "developed" (whatever this neocolonial paradigm means), but QUALITY is surely a part of our world ;-)
ReplyDeleteRegards from Persepolis,
Aditya Kumarmangalam Jain
Dear Aditya Kumarmangalam Jain,
DeleteOne is unable to see how your clairvoyant granny’s flight to the lands of Alexander, Darius and Babur back in the 70s with her litter is connected to the essay of the Vande Bharat Paradox.
The blog is a penetrative discourse on the contorted attempt by the ruling dispensation to take a step forward and two backwards on an institutionalised scale of fantasy.
Your happy circumstances are felicitous, but for you to gloat over your good fortune is contextually unpleasant and comprehensively irrelevant. Additionally, it strikes a jarring chord in the minds of those concerned of the country’s deteriorating social and scientific ethos, as a flippant note from one who has left the land for good, yet cocks a snook at its residing citizens.
If you find it appropriate to reverse your contribution, one can respond likewise.
Regards from Gateway of India,
Vishwas Patankar.
Oh, you ought not tell me how I conduct myself in a public forum. I have NOT used any disrespectful words against any community. That I have been "polemic" against the Congress, that is very well within the scope of what one ought and ought not utter against a political party.
DeleteThat I have spoken of "substandards" being promoted since the time of Congress, there is nothing "arrogant" or blatantly indecent about it. I have right to be ethnocentric, if I prefer some ethnicities over the others.
And yes, WE BOAST, BECAUSE WE HAVE SOMETHING TO BOAST ABOUT. I do not want to feel GUILT, if I inherit and live a luxurious life. I am NOT hurting anyone. This conversation ends here, I am blocking you.
@Vishwas Patankar: I cannot understand why you are overreacting. If I were to be a woman of means, I would of course want to live in a society where women can have civil liberties like freedom of thought and expression, polygamy and economic prosperity. Infact, I would be inspired by anyone who broke out of the patriarchy and saw early enough what is going to come. I would rather call it "prudence".
DeleteVishwas, I am afraid, you seem to nourish some socio-cultural bias which is making you look daggers at people who "have made it".
It would appear that the present dispensation is in love with rising numbers and escalating conformism. This is good material for those deafening speeches that mislead millions of voters into succumbing to vague or false promises.
ReplyDeleteEducation sector receives the worst treatment. Here, again, it is a game of numbers. Creation of universities that do not fulfil their purpose and having education related bodies that undertake to knowledge and its freedom is the worst sin that can be committed by a government. See, for instance, the kind of "educationists" selected to head universities like JNU, or to direct university affairs from the UGC. The revision of syllabi is a step that can lead to what the extreme rightists have been criticising about the Islamic adherence to Quranic education etc : we are doing very much the same by resorting to outdated texts and belief systems. This is amply reflected in the revision of syllabi for schools.
The Vande Bharat paradox is like picturing a half-naked urchin defacating on railway tracks with a cellphone in his palms.
ReplyDeleteThat's a good one! A picture (even if imaginary) speaks a thousand word!
DeleteAnd now we have a Vande Mataram paradox too.To to up churlish behaviour and gloat over disregarding traditional democratic protocol norms for State Banquets!IMF's C Grade extends well beyond GDP!
ReplyDeleteMy initial impulse was to point out the performative politics of the current government. But that only echoes so many. What if we went a level deeper.
ReplyDeleteWhere does this government come from?
It comes from the Indian people who are a product of an education system that provides degrees but doesn't educate.
From a society that is more interested in flexing some caste lineage than looking past caste.
From men who just cannot stomach the idea of a woman having any agency.
From a media that would rather mislead than inform.
From the Indian uncle generation who should know better but don't.
From citizens who hate someone they don't know.
From citizens who take "pride" in something they had no part in.
Etc. Etc.
The naked truth is that is the best we can do. Garbage in. Garbage out.
Very much true. I would only like to add that the faschists of Europe and the US have long been supporting fascism globally, and of course on our subcontinent.
DeleteOh, I also forgot to add, looking for someone else to blame. What do the fascists of the US and Europe have to do with our substandard institutions being run half heartedly by disinterested people?
DeleteI really do not know why you believe that I tried to contradict you. So I cannot really fathom your subtle animosity. What have the fascists of Europe and the US to do with the politics of our subcontinent? Well, it would suffice that I write here a few names and you do Wiki about them.
Delete1) Christophe Jaffrelot
2) Savitri Devi Mukherji (born Maximiani Julia Portas)
Any reader with some experience would then trace back the very history and your "substandard institutions" and the attempts to radiclise them by the global faschists. But I think, some of this discussion has already happened with Karan Thapar on his channel.
I would hardly characterize my response as displaying animosity, subtle or otherwise. I try to respond in the same spirit as Avay’s blog, although I wish I had his gift with puns and humour. My comment was merely a question, one that I still have even after researching the two individuals you mentioned. The first one can hardly be characterized as a fascist. The second was indeed one given her passionate support of the Nazis. But I ask yet again, and this time ever so gently, what do those two, or any other European fascists, have to do with our inability to run basic institutions with even a modicum of excellence? I think there is a propensity within certain circles in India to blame our policy failures and our lackluster public institutions on some grand Western conspiracy funded by fascists, Trump, Soros, , etc. Ultimately, aren’t we responsible for our destiny? Can we honestly blame outsiders for our politicians' decisions to beautify stations rather than extend the coverage of railway safety systems across the entire network? Of not enforcing DGCA rules over airlines? Of not even trying to ensure that government-run schools meet even basic standards? The list is endless and daunting, and it is indeed comforting to some to blame an external entity, but as I implied, we reap what we sow.
DeleteI would also like to add that if you are looking for a fascist organization to blame, you don’t need to look far. We have our own home grown one in the form of the RSS.
DeleteThanks for your reply. I did not mean to say that Christophe Jaffrelot is a fascist. But he is "the one" (among few others) who has ably demonstrated how a significant number of social institutions and organisations (not just the ones wearing khaki shorts) in post-independent India were heavily influenced by European fascists. For instance, one could critically ask why of all other Indian cities it was Poona where German language and culture was promoted (as early as since 1914). And if you would read the Wiki article on "Savitri Devi" a bit more critically, you would see that she was not just a fascist, but very much an "agent" who would come to play a role among Indian intellectuals even after the defeat of fascism in Europe. The scary part is, there were hundres or more like her who had ties in all social life of post-independent India. Five or six years ago, the German ambassador was "caught" visiting a very prominent figure in Nagpur at his headquarters, an organisation which today has more than 3000 branches worldwide, including in countries as "exotic" and remote as Finland and the "dark interiors" of the African continent.
DeleteNow, you rightly ask what has this all to do with the competence of our socio-administrative institutions. How are fascists of Europe and the US responsible for the defunct state of our civil institutions? At the first glance, there seems to be no link at all. But if one were to turn a few pages back in the "passbook" of our country, a very different picture appears. One sees, how the Bretton Woods system, World Bank and then the IMF imposed something the Germans call "Strukturanpassung" (I am half German by the way ), which they render as "structural adjustments". So whenever these institutions lend money to a "developing country" (I myself find that this is a neocolonial imposition) like India, almost everything is "dictated" by these lenders. Now what is this "everything" that I am so vaguely talking about? It literally means everything: (i) the scale or degree upto which the country is allowed to adopt socialism and "welfare state"; (ii) the ratio between the number of private corporations, businesses and the number of stately undertakings and stately sponsored corporations; (iii) the dominant narrative in the media and at private and stately funded corportations concerning the perception of the US and West Europe; (iv) the nature and ultimate aims of socio-cultural and financial organisations. There are hundreds of more clauses in the "structure adjustment" programms of the IMF.
What happens when India conspicuously disregards any of these clauses? Well, surely they dont send their military. But (speaking ironically) something still worse happens, and that is an immediate halt to any further loans given to India and blacklisting of the country. I need not say what consequences all this then has. Although India is NOT taking any more loans from the IMF since 2000s, it is still very much in a very disadvantaged situation vis-a-vis the IMF.
You might rightly protest and say, "Hey, are you a confused lunatic? What has all this to do with Euroamerican fascists having a say on whether or not our basic civil institutions function or not?". Well again, the IMF itself is surely not run by some fascists. But there is another "big daddy" in the room, who is atleast 25 times "richer" and politically a few thousand times more powerful than the IMF itself; this "big daddy" is always around, holding a big baseball club in his hands to punish those who undertake to play even slightly against his rules. And this "big daddy" is BlackRock, who does not directly lend to the IMF itself, but in effect has the ultimate say in everything the IMF is allowed to do.
And guess what, those very very few whose funds this "big daddy" manages, they are very much fascists in the true sense of the word. Because they "dictate" and mostly get their "dictates" implemented in almost all corners of those countries which have a "free market". Even the smallest details in the structure and functioning of these "free market economies" is meticulously paid attention to by the "big daddy". For instance, the big daddly usually dislikes any socio-political-cultural-educational institutions like a school, a university or a think tank advocating socialism and "mutual aid as understood by Kropotkin"; if an institution like this starts becoming more and more prominent and widely acknowledged, it is at this point when the "big-daddy" intervenes, and this of course not in a direct way. This is the reason why many faculties of social sciences and humanities of stately funded public universities even in countries like Germany, France, UK and the US are pressurised to either promote ideoligies in line with the "free market" and a profit sucking privatisation or just face serious funding cuts.
DeleteAgain, what has this all to do with our destiny and our ability to administer our institutions so that they function? Nothing, and everything! To put it across in a very "unscholarly" manner: The institutions which are not working are being abandoned, for they are since a long time on the list of the "big daddy" who would like to see them privatised. "Corruption" and getting away with "corruption" are just tactics and instruments for imposing privatisation, which again amounts to "Strukturanpassung", i.e. structural adjustment.
If you still need more evidence for the "wild" claims I am making here, then please ask as to why and how "neoliberalism" could be successfully imposed on India (1991 marks the beginning) ;-)
Kind regards
Nishi
P.S.: I would like to quote your words: "We have our own home grown one in the form of the [..]. "
DeleteThis organisation was NEVER home grown; the less prominent founding members were on frequent visits to German and Italy since the beginning of the 20th century. What were they doing? They were "networking". Is there any evidence for this claim? Tones and tones of! See again Christoph Jafferlot. And likewise there are tones and tones of documented evidence that faschist figures from all over Europe visited the "home grown" organisation even in the post-independent India.
The bottom line - we (thankfully not all of us) are a pompous, self gloating bunch of morons ensuring that the country slides rapidly southward to end up as a banana republic (if we have not already achieved that goal).
ReplyDeleteWonderful to see all well known readers and commentators are alive and well. I just needed desperately to catch up and while I'm glad I did with the statistics, what's this I hear about Mohua Moitra challenging the Shah about explaining Vande Mataram in Bengal? Or do I have a*** wise as always?
ReplyDeleteGood wishes from Nagrota Bagwan.