Add this

Friday 21 July 2023

HIMACHAL'S DAY AFTER- RENDER UNTO NATURE WHAT IS NATURE'S

 

                                NATURE  RECLAIMS  HER OWN

 [This blog was published in OUTLOOK (outlookindia.com) on 20.7.2023]

  It took Nature just one cataclysmic week in Himachal to reclaim the spaces which Man had been encroaching upon for decades, both in the river valleys and the mountain slopes. As the waters begin receding, they leave behind ample evidence of our hubris, stupidity and avarice.

  Himachal has so far lost about 110 lives, dozens of vehicles ,hundreds of buildings and bridges, and many kilometres of roads. But one fact is clear- the maximum destruction of lives and public and private party has occurred in the river valleys of the Beas and Ravi, and along the two four laned arteries of the NHA- Parwanoo-Solan and Mandi-Manali. It is no coincidence that these are precisely the alignments where our policy makers have caused the maximum devastation of the environment.

  Our anthropogenic footprints in these areas have been overwhelming, much more than what Nature can sustain and repair. Different digits of this footprint- illegal and legal mining, building construction on steep slopes and the rivers’ flood plains, hydel projects with their attendant blasting and muck dumping, road construction and widening, deforestation of thousands of trees- all these coalesced in this one week of July and triggered a reaction by the elements which should have been expected.

  Environmentalists have long been warning the government of these consequence of its reckless degradation of the environment. The Shukla Committee report (commissioned by the High Court itself) of 2010 had called for a halt to hydel projects and for protection of the rivers, arguing that “there is no such thing as an environment-friendly hydel project.” Practical proof was provided, if proof was needed, by the devastation of Rishi Ganga and Uttarkashi. But our governments are nothing if not blind and deaf, and so all scientific and expert warnings were ignored, and life went on as usual in the interests of "tourism" and "development".

Let us be clear about one thing: this month’s devastation is not due to climate change or extreme weather events- these have certainly amplified the problem but have not created them. They have been created by wrong policies, bad engineering, lax enforcement and criminal disregard of scientific principles and expert advice.

Much of the four laning of the Manali right bank road has been done ON THE RIVER BED of the Beas, as videos now show, by erecting retaining walls on the flood plains and filling them up. Where have the NHAI engineers got their degrees from, for God’s sake? Do they even have an idea of the destructive force of a mountain river cascading down in full flow, carrying huge boulders, trees and silt that will demolish anything in its path? Did they ever bother to study the history of the Beas and the damage it has caused in the past? Today, at least 6 kms of the four laning has been washed away, this road between Kullu and Manali will remain closed for months. It is significant to note that the only road still functional- the left bank road- is the road which the NHAI did not (thankfully) touch. Surely there’s a lesson for us here.

The four lane highway between Parwanoo and Dharampur also no longer exists: after spending Rs.4000 crores and ten years on converting a two lane into a four lane we are now left with the original two lane highway! The cause here is not a river but a mountain slope, and stupid engineering again. The original road was widened by cutting vertically into the mountain slopes, sometimes as much as 15 to 20 metres. One wonders whether the PWD and NHAI engineers had done their technical due diligence before letting loose their machines on this portion of the Himalayas. Did they, for instance, study the geomorphology of the mountains? Carry out tests to determine natural bulk density, soil resistivity, bearing capacity of the soil? Did they do a hydrometer analysis and sieve analysis of the soil to determine the water absorbing capability of the soil? Did they take adequate steps such as rock concreting and anchor bolting to stabilise the excavated portions of the slopes? The extent of the damage would suggest that perhaps none of this was done and so here also the four laning is just a memory now. More public money down the drain, along with thousands of tonnes of muck and rocks. We hope the govt. will respond to some of the questions raised above, but I am not holding my breath.

This constant road construction has generated millions of tonnes of muck which has just been dumped into the rivers, raising their beds, constricting their width and reducing their carrying capacity. Just imagine, the Kiratpur-Manali four lane alone has 21 tunnels- where do you think all that excavated muck has gone? On paper they have been dumped in landfills, the enormous cost involved shown in estimates and paid to the contractors, but in fact they have been dumped in the nearest river or just rolled down the hill-side!

Enter illegal (and legal) mining and rampant construction of buildings on the river beds, which goes on unchecked everywhere. This, along with the muck dumping, results in the rivers changing course quite often: this phenomenon has been responsible for much of the damage along the Beas this time. This too is something our highway engineers neither anticipated nor planned for.

Hydel projects too have played their part in the destruction. They obstruct the natural flow of these rivers, allow the building up of muck and sediment, and then release them in a torrent when they open their floodgates- it is this, rather than just the waters, which cause the maximum damage, especially to buildings and bridges, on impact. These dams are touted as flood control mechanisms, but in fact the opposite is true, at least on mountain rivers. They retain vast volumes of water (which is their revenue generating inventory, after all) till the last moment; when they release these waters, the consequences downstream are cataclysmic: most of the flooding and destruction in Pandoh market and Mandi this time was caused by the opening of all five flood gates of the Pandoh dam.

As I write this, the full extent of the destruction is yet to be assessed. Restoration work shall start soon, and that is precisely what I am fearful of. More taxpayers’ money will be used to repeat the mistakes of the past. My most fervent hope and prayer is that we learn from this catastrophe and change our engineering, planning and ambitions- that we do not build again on the river beds, that we stop this four laning madness, that we stop the blasting, tunnelling and vertical cutting of mountain sides, that we start listening to the objections of the local populations and acknowledge their protests, that we put a moratorium on further hydel projects. Surely the government should be able to see the mathematics, if not the science and common sense, in what has just happened?- in just two weeks the state has suffered more revenue loss than what it can earn in years. Yes, climate change is aggravating the severity of EWEs, but that is precisely why we should be changing our paradigms of "development" to a more sustainable model. Climate change should be a trigger for change, not an excuse for justifying our past (and continuing) mistakes. It’s more than time to stop this cycle of stupidity from playing out again and again every few years. Nature has started reclaiming what was always rightfully hers. Respect that and do not provoke her again.

12 comments:

  1. # when western disturbances barrel in during jun, jul, to coincide with the monsoon moving up from bengal, bihar towards uttar pradesh, uttarakhand, himachal, punjab, there is heavy precipitation. this coincidence phenomenon took place in jun, 2013, and now again in 2023. western disturbances originate over the eastern mediterranean, move westwards picking up more moisture over the black sea, and then the caspian. extra-tropical storms, they are driven by the westerlies, and the sub-tropical westerly jet stream, carrying moisture in the upper-atmosphere; monsoon winds carry moisture in the lower-atmosphere. the western disturbances, when they encounter the himalayas, shed their moisture. usually a feature of the cold weather [punjab rabi crop receives moisture from the western disturbances] these moisture laden winds occur occasionally in april-may. their occurrence in jun, jul, to coincide with the monsoon results in the extraordinary precipitation. true the devastation is not exclusively influenced by natural causes, anthropogenic drivers are increasingly to blame. and amplify the devastation. in the current disaster, 110 lives have been lost in himachal, compared to 2013 uttarakhand, when 5,700 souls were 'presumed dead' in that state. pwd, cpwd, border roads, national highway authority, etc, etc, are professional organizations with an impressive complement of engineers, administrators, accountants, auditors - all recruited subsequent to the rigorous protocols of the union and state public service commissions. all decision makers have behind them many years of professional experience; having progressed to higher responsibilities after rigorous vetting. it is the rare b.tech from one of the prestigious indian institutes of technology, madras, bombay, delhi, kanpur, kharagpur who would be found among the engineers. true there will be many who have burnished their curriculum vitae with post-graduate qualifications from these celebrated engineering schools. where you will find IIT B.Tech would be in the ranks of the generalist administrators, and astonishingly, in the accounts and audit functionaries. IIT B. Tech usually prefer financial engineering subsequent to a generalist MBA from the celebrated indian institutes of management, ahmedabad, calcutta, bangaloor, harvard business school and other highly selective B schools in north america. astonishingly, you will even find them in the postal department, income tax collection, but oddly enough never in the CPWD, border road, national highways authority, railway engineers, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Not an easy problem to tackle due to its multi dimensional impact... Yet the architecture of a climate resilient strategy that is technically sound and adaptive, hence dynamic, needs framing urgently. Once framed the stakeholders need to revisit it regularly to refine this template based on the learnings derived from such extreme conditions/ impacts. Customising this template for area specific solutions is needed. Gular capacity building of a core team will improve response, institutional memory, adaptive resilience. Involving the citizen in such an exercise is vital for ensuring that they feel an active part of the solution not merely passive victims.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Its not a hard problem to solve, really. "Follow the money," is all that is needed. Most vanity and excessive infrastructure are simply ways to make more money--directly through siphoning and corruption, and indirectly by showing "development" which helps win elections--which enables the direct corruption.

      Anyone who hopes for enlightened and honest politicians and contractors, should continue in their dream land. Until citizens don't understand that democracy is not about voting--that is just the superficial ritual of democracy--but about doing whatever it takes to make voices heard and hold public representatives accountable--our democracy will remain deeply flawed and the above groups will keep exploiting the situation and people.

      But THIS is not an easy problem. For we remain a deeply divided, corrupt and self-centered society (true there are always exceptions) and that is reflected in how the country managed and developed.

      Delete
  3. In Simla it was sometime in the early '70s that, overnight, the road leading from the ridge to lakkar bazar inexplicably dropped down around 5', leaving the steps leading up to the Regal cinema and adjacent buildings hanging mid air. Wooden steps had to be hastily constructed for one to reach the original concrete steps.
    Within a couple of days the government of the day ordered the immediate stoppage of any further building work on that side of the Jakhoo hill. An order which lasted for almost 2 years before it was openly flouted/abetted. What one see now walking down that road is nothing if not a disaster literally waiting to happen.
    And when it does, as it MUST, in that urban jungle which is the new Simla, the death and destruction would be a calamity of unimaginable proportions.
    In all this, no one will learn or accept that you simply CANNOT mess around with nature!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Everytime nature wreaks devastation upon a geography, the environmentalists and naturalists come out screaming "I-told-you-so".
    They are correct. Everytime. Anthropogenic violation does speed Nature's degradation. But exploding the lungs out with environmentally loaded statements does not require collegiate skill-sets.

    What is an administration expected to do?
    Are dams, hydel projects, electrification, transport and communication networks, roads, cable cars, to be avoided in the mountainous terrain of Himachal? The infrastructure being built inside is not for indigenous utilisation alone but has a regional footprint. To work as an enabler of Tourism, perhaps the prime earner of the State. To generate surplus electricity for sale to other States. To harness rivers for mitigating the perennial water woes faced in the North. In India, government-sponsored infrastructure is the sole heavy lifter doing employment generation today. To demand its stop within a place is as absurd as the idea of rampant , rash structuralisation is. Those who envisioned the development of Himachal and initiated work did not come solely from a perverse motive of avarice or pecuniary embellishment. Or from infinite insularity towards the fragile ecology of the pristinely beautiful State. Neither could those who executed the projects and put the nuts and bolts in place have derived joy from denuding, concreting its stretches of paradise. The national Met. says that the torrential downpour in Himachal was the worst one in 50 years yet. Catastrophes will occur by their inherent identity. Creation and Destruction are coterminous philosophically and verily. If our population is our demographic dividend, it is also our disaster quotient.

    Branding governments as uncaring, indifferent and pinning other slurs achieves little; do the post-disaster chest-beaters have a feasible economic solution for the aftermath that can be a viable alternative to maintaining employment, ensuring livelihoods, and assuring continuity in the lives of affected people? Essentially the balance between Nature and Man must be arrived at before the shout-out to halt development is sounded. Else the taxpayers will pay far more to finance the comforts derived by the pensioners who are now demanding the old scheme and are forcing the hand of the government to foot the bill, with 2024 round the corner.

    Those who were the older inhabitants of Shimla and other towns of Himachal but sold their lands, are to share in the culpability of its depletion. Shedding copious tears on the disappearing greenery or the vanishing glaciers when they return to their once-upon-a-time nest is as hollow now as their current prosperity is meaningful. To which the sale of their immovable asset has perhaps contributed in no insignificant measure. The ones who have stayed on but added storeys upon storeys over their residences and sold or tenanted them are no less liable for having disturbed the delicate balance of livability. Reckless construction of resorts by the politically connected, altering the course of rivers and nullahs, despatching construction debris down the slopes, throttling the landscape with plastic and garbage - cause far more damage from attrition than a planned project designed with the mind and mettle of the State.

    Nature must and Nature will reclaim that which is her's. Man has to reconcile to the truth that he has borrowed from her for his existence. He has to return it to her, either peacefully, or from devastation upon her enragement.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Mr. Patankar's efforts to run with the "environmental" hare and hunt with the "developmental" hounds is not very convincing, and does him no credit. Primarily because he ignores all the science on climate change and global warming that has accumulated over the years. Even as the UN announced yesterday that we will cross the 1.5 celsius doomsday barrier by 2030, he continues to spout discredited, theoretical arguments about the continued need for dams, over tourism, roads, concretisation. The planet can no longer sustain the kind of "prosperity" or developmental "networks" he sets so much store by; his faith in governments to do the right thing is touching but contrary to all experience; his contempt for environmentalists, whom he castigates as "chest beaters", only indicates how much he is out of touch with the issues he comments upon. He is simply trotting out arguments which no one in his right senses considers valid today. The whole global movement today is towards the REDUCTION OF CONSUMPTION- of water, electricity, meat, travel, tourism, fossil fuels, cars, flying- and towards finding more sustainable alternatives for them, moving to a circular economy with near-zero waste, construction and building practices that follow the contours of nature rather than go against them.
    We cannot go on this path if govts continue to build more dams, roads, power stations, hotels and resorts as heretofore. The path of least resistance is no longer an option. Responsive governments have started to realise this and have now begun dismantling dams, pedestrianising roads, decommissioning power plants, closing beaches, banning cruise ships, restricting numbers of tourists, increasing tariffs, introducing carbon taxes and so on. India is a laggard in all respects, which is why its citizens continue to suffer every year from the consequences of our govt's inaction, cupidity and downright stupidity. The consequences of these last three attributes get amplified further when it comes to the Himalayan states, where the geology is fragile, the ecology more sensitive and the balance of nature and man very tenuous.
    Mr. Patankar is being disingenuous again when he repeats the cliche about maintaining the "balance" between development and nature. He could not be more wrong: the time to maintain a balance is long gone- what is needed now is to CORRECT the balance which has been skewed in favour of the kind of destructive development Mr. Patankat seems to support. In fact, it is the kind of thinking which he, an erudite man, displays which emboldens governments like Mr. Modi's to continue to plunder and ravage nature. Sadly, it is the common man who suffers and pays the price: people like Mr. Patankar and I have the resources to shock proof our lives. Don't look or talk down to people who plead the cause of the environment, sir, they are doing your dirty job for you and your descendants. Get out of your school debate mode, open your eyes, see the devastation all around you, and take a stand. The right stand, sir- there is only one.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mr. Shukla is livid as the Beas was two weeks back. He boots me off Patlikhul to send me hurtling down the slope in a furious attempt to chase me out of Himachal, now that the road there has vanished.
    While I careen and rapidly relinquish altitude, I still disagree with his there-is-only-one-way approach.

    Reduction, abstinence, and other means of consuming less are good to bounce off rapt audiences at global conferences held biannually, where Mr. Shukla's environmental grand-daughter Greta Thunberg dazzles the world.
    Reduction, abstinence, and other means of consuming less are good to opine when sitting in a rocking chair in front of a crackling fire, cocooned in a warm robe with the decanter and crystal of single malt by the side, watching the snow falling outside.
    Reduction, abstinence and other means of consuming less are good when those unconstrained of money and unchallenged of means choose to do so voluntarily, even if for a short duration till the mind and heart have had their fill.

    Mr. Shukla is the voice of the well fed, well heeled and well groomed who are genuinely concerned about the environment, having derived their uninterrupted joy from it and continue to do so. I do not dispute their apprehension. The resistance is to these voices asking - no - instructing, ordering the others not to do so, or seeking to ban the entry of the current generation into the territories that these environmentalists feel are fragile and disturbed. He has made his career in Himachal, where many projects have fructified to see the light of day with his active participation or at least presence. These are the same projects that he appears to be against now, perhaps forgetting that many careers of government and private personnel have been successful owing to their designing, execution and functioning. Is it his case that all of these infrastructures were not required some decades back when they commenced? Or perhaps the young and budding environmentalist Avay did not foresee back then the devastation they were capable of some years into the future.

    I am admittedly running with the environment hare and hunting with the development hound as put aptly by Mr. Shukla. I am more for regulations, titrations, and adopting a measured approach than abrupt and blanket halts to infrastructure and tourism, which I feel is a panic reaction to the foghorn sounded by those taking the onerous task of the preservation of nature upon themselves. Economic and commercial compulsions cannot be ignored in a poor country like ours, whatever Narendra Modi may feel or say about the nation's swelling GDP.

    India is a laggard in decisions concerning the environment, because the sheer magnitude of the population that we carry with us renders any and every attempt a non starter from the planning stage. It is feasible for Sweden to ban smoking or reduce its aviation to a level desired by most. Greta Thunberg is admirable for her climate concern and her Nobel is richly deserved. To follow in her footsteps and apply the same in India, a country that barely has a per capita income of USD 2300, thanks primarily to the top 1 percent, is breathtakingly imaginative. To tell gennext to stay away from Himachal and other Himalayan paradises because they have to be preserved is a specious and, if I may add, misdirected expectation.
    Tourism cannot be a preserve of the wealthy exclusively. Regulations and restrictions must apply equally upon all to ensure that prescribed standards of environmental care are observed.
    Infrastructure needs to be pursued - and now that we are more aware of the collateral damage to the environment - in a measured way, observing new and circuitous methods of protection.

    If this is a school level debate, it is in response to a couch environmentalist's presentation.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You are again off-track, sir: it is precisely the "well fed, the well-heeled and the well groomed" (your apt words) who are the consumption villains, and it is their appetites that the merciless exploitation of the planet caters to. Not the common man who consumes less than one tenth of what the fat cats too. Hence the need to curb this excessive consumption. By resisting this you are doing grave injustice not only to the planet but also to the more deprived sections of society. I do hope you can see the light some day. We could perhaps have kept this exchange going, were it not for the fact that you are less interested in facts and more inclined to focus on my past, career, material status and drinking preferences, without, as usual, having the slightest idea about them.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mr. Shukla's past, career, drinking preferences and material status, although admirable and possibly subjects of envy if studied in greater depth, are neither the objects of focus nor interest for now as his impression is. His perspective though, of enforcing embargoes on infrastructure and tourism - which could mean the denial to others of the economic benefits and soothing bounties of Nature with his restrictive endeavour to preserve it - certainly is, and is opposed.
    He is evidently not liking the discussion, and it best be dropped. In any case we seem to be on the two parallel banks of the Beas, so any sort of a unification appears improbable.

    ReplyDelete
  9. My small bit on this debate.
    दरकते पहाड़ ...
    सतीश अग्निहोत्री

    पर्यावरण को समतल से देशनिकाला देकर
    सत्ता का मन जब नहीं भरा
    अहंकारी विकास, अपनी रौ में
    पहाड़ों की ओर चल पड़ा

    सत्ता और पूंजी का होगा, अदभुत गठबंधन
    पहाडों के संसाधनों का, अब होवेगा दोहन
    कटेंगे जंगल अब विकास के बहाने
    बारूद से टूटेंगी बेबस चट्टानें
    परंपराओं को धता बताती चौड़ी सड़कें
    और दुतर्फा सजे हुए माल और दुकानें

    सत्ता के रथ के पीछे दरबारियों के काफले
    अवाम से बनाये रखेंगे सैलानी फासले
    पहाड़ों पर अब तेजी से विकास होगा
    समतल सी सुविधाओं का एहसास भी होगा

    अपने ही घर से बेदखल होंगे पहाड़ी
    पूंजी के आगेहतबल होंगे पहाड़ी

    पूंजी का होता है अपना ही तर्क
    पर्वत निवासियों से उसे पडता नहीं कोई फर्क

    उसे चाहिये ये उंचे-उंचे पहाड़
    और उनके नीचे दबी खनिज संपदा अपार

    स्थानीयों को क्या करना है लेकर ये पहाड़ी
    उन्हें मिल जायेगा उनका मुआवजा और दिहाड़ी

    पर देश को अगर आगे बढ़ना है
    तो पहाड़ों का यह गरूर तोड़ना है
    नये विकास की गूंजेगी अब नयी दहाड.
    सत्ता और पूंजी को बस चाहियें दरकते पहाड़

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Very beautiful and meaningful, Sir. My concern is no less in intent than yours or the blog owner's. Our approaches are different. Your poem is stirring to read.

      Delete
  10. Well said, Mr Agnihotri. A perspective from the mountain dwellers which some erudite interlocutors are blind to and refuse to acknowledge.

    ReplyDelete