Add this

Saturday 28 September 2024

HIMACHAL SHOULD REGULATE TREKKING TO MAKE IT SAFE AND ECO-FRIENDLY ( II)

 

RESTORE  THE  WILD  IN THE  WILDERNESS

[ The second of two blogs on the subject. The first was published on the 30th August, 2024.]

The Himachal Chief Minister recently announced that the state govt. has identified 50 new locations for developing tourism, including adventure sports. The prospect fills me with dread, because the govt.'s track record in this respect so far has been an environmental disaster. Forget the mess in Shimla, Manali, Kufri, Mashobra, McLeodganj or Kasauli. In recent years this tentacle of "development" has seized within its coils places which were pristine areas even ten or fifteen years ago.

The govt's concept of development usually consists of just building bad roads to provide easier vehicular access to these areas, and to allow the mushrooming of hotels, shops, guest houses, home stays without any regulation or regard to carrying capacity. I can quote any number of examples of places which have been turned into environmental shambles to "promote" tourism: Bir-Billing, where so many unauthorised constructions have come up that paragliders have difficulty in locating safe landing spots (and now a wholly unnecessary motorable road is being built from Billing to Rajagunda, towards the majestic Thamsar pass, which will spoil a lovely trek); the road to the sublime Hatu peak above Narkanda:what was once an idyllic 8km walk through dense deodar and oak forests has now been converted into a twenty minute drive and the once verdant pastures at the top have become rutted and dusty parking areas; a road has been built right up to Prashar lake in Mandi district-it has devastated the meadows there, and the unscientific cutting has become the cause of continuous landslides there; another ten km road is being built right through the heart of the Choordhar wild life sanctuary from Nohradhar, and just last week the NGT has issued notice to the state govt. for constructing a road through the Shikari Devi WLS.

All this is just sheer madness- these roads will result in deforestation on a massive scale, calamitous effects on the wildlife in these dense forests, unregulated construction and the consequent scarring of the landscape and generation of thousands of tonnes of muck and debris, blocking of nullahs and water courses, the ingress of thousands of vehicles and even more thousands of irresponsible tourists every day. The revered pilgrimages that added so much value to the traditions and mystique  of the state- Mani Mahesh in Chamba, Shikari Devi in Mandi, Kheerganga in the Parvati valley, Kinner Kailash in Kinnaur, Srikhand Mahadev on the border of Shimla and Kullu- now look like mass migration routes between Columbia and Mexico. Tens of thousands of so called "pilgrims" descend on these valleys and mountains every year leaving behind thousands of tonnes of garbage, plastic, human waste and denuding the nearby forests for their cooking and camp fires. Even the highly endangered and precious "dhoop" shrubs are pulled out by their roots and used for fuel.

What were once challenging but enjoyable treks have now become Ola and Uber rides or overcrowded linear garbage dumps, and the natural wonders of the state are being consumed irreparably at a frightening pace. The wild is being removed from the wilderness. It is high time the state govt. reversed this trend and changed its policies at least towards the few remaining genuine wild spots in the state. We have to preserve this wilderness, their ecology and biodiversity and wildlife for future generations. Other countries have realised this and are taking steps in this direction: from Australia to Brazil, from the UK to Chile, landscapes, abandoned farmlands, ranches, golf clubs, used up quarries are being returned to the wild and reforested, not just by governments but also by private trusts and philanthropists who raise funds for the purpose.  Himachal should learn from them, even if the rest of India doesn't.

First, control the numbers. Another troubling proclamation by the Chief Minister is that the state intends to more than double its tourist arrivals to fifty million by 2030. This would be apocalyptical - there is just no way a state of seven million can sustainably handle such a number, seven times its population. Instead, go in for quality, not mass, tourism. Forget about the bleeding hearts who object to pricing out the "poor": tourism is a product, like any other, and if you have a unique product (like Himachal's natural landscapes) don't short sell it. If people can pay Rs. 500 for a ticket for a Salman Khan trash film, or thousands for a Coldplay live performance, they should not complain if they are asked to pay the same, or more, for the sighting of a brown bear or a western tragopan in the Great Himalayan National Park, or being able to see the coruscating beauty of the night sky at Mantalai lake.

Second, start charging for the treks, depending on their length, environmental impacts, altitude, proximity to glaciers and snowfields, fragility of the landscapes, number of camping nights. One was happy to read that trekkers and campers at Triund are now being charged Rs.250 per night. It's a good beginning, but the fee needs to be raised to at least Rs. 500 per night. Triund is right at the base of the Dhauladhars, the terrain is rocky and fragile, it has no water or toilet disposable facilities; the footprint of any camper there is huge, and he/she should be charged proportionately. For longer treks, the charges should be a minimum of Rs. 500 per night. Part of this levy should go the local EcoSoc (Ecotourism Society) for maintenance and cleanliness of the trails/ areas.

Three, impose a complete ban on camping at altitudes above 3800 metres or in the vicinity of glaciers. This is also the recommendation of a group of scientists/geologists who have studied the impact of camping at high altitudes in Ladakh, Himachal, and Uttarakhand. ( Save the Himalayas: Ban High-Altitude camping, say Ecologists. HIMBUMAIL. 5th August, 2024.) They have found that the camp fires, vehicle emissions, decaying waste matter etc. raise the levels of aerosols and black carbon in the immediate area, leading to a more rapid melting of the glaciers. They have specifically noted this process in the Bara Shigri glacier and in the Chandratal- Batal area in Lahaul Spiti. There is also the issue of the trash and human waste left behind in these pristine landscapes, exposing the local rare wildlife to germs and diseases they have no immunity against. 

It was heartening to note that, as of last month, the local Divisional Forest Officer has banned camping at Kheerganga in the Parbati valley in Kullu. ( Last time I was there the place looked like the Tibetan Dhaba area of north Delhi). This bold initiative, however, has to be extended to other environmentally sensitive areas such as: Chandratal lake, Mantalai lake, all the area above Bhim Dwar on the Srikhand Mahadev trek, the entire area between Nalanti and Chitkul on the Kinner Kailash trek, the Choordhar peak. The Forest department should do a survey of such areas and compile a list for purposes of notification and enforcement.

Four, the Himachal govt. should wake up to the massive degradation that is being caused by so-called "spiritual tourism" in the remoter regions of the state, triggered by the flood of humanity that swamps these destinations every year. Just to give an example: in 1976, as the SDM Chamba, I had accompanied the "yatra" to the holy Manimahesh lake: at that time there were perhaps just about three hundred pilgrims, but even then it was a problem ensuring the cleanliness of the camping grounds at Hadsar, Dhancho, Donali and Gauri Kund. After this year's yatra 8 tonnes of garbage has already been collected by volunteers but much more still remains. Today, about 6 lakhs to 7 lakh people visit the lake on the yatra. This is simply unsustainable: I'm told the lake is full of trash and plastic, the entire trail resembles an elongated latrine pit. I have no reason to believe that the same is not happening to other "yatra" trails- Shikari Devi, Kinner Kailash, Choordhar, Srikhand Mahadev. The govt. should immediately do something about restricting the numbers on these yatras, before we reach the same depths of degradation and destruction as the Char Dham yatra of Uttarakhand. ( To realise what the deplorable current state of the Char Dham yatra route is, one must read an article by Priyadarshani Patel- Char Dham to Char Daam: Desecrating the Himalayas in the Name of "Spiritual Tourism" in THE WIRE of July 13, 2024).

And finally, even nature needs a rest to recover. All trekking trails, especially the high-altitude ones, should be shut down for a year or two at periodic intervals to allow the ecology and wild-life there to  recover and recuperate, reclaim their natural and breeding rhythms, to get a respite from the incessant noise, disturbances and foraging of plant life by thousands of trekkers every year. Many countries faced with similar over-trekking issues are beginning to realise this and have started providing these regular breaks.

The policy makers in Himachal need to wake up urgently to preserve the unique natural landscape of the state. Its over exploitation should be stopped before the devastation reaches a point of no-return. Sustainable policies should be put in place which harvest natural assets scientifically and not squander them recklessly for short term gains. Mother nature will not offer a second chance.



9 comments:

  1. Very timely and relevant issues flagged. Now one has to wait and see if various departments and officials have the courage and the will to protect the environment in their jurisdictions. Many a time, departments work at cross purposes, resulting in nature being at the receiving end. Of course, Mother Nature has retaliated every now and then, and we humans label it as 'natural disasters' never considering what we had done to deserve such treatment. I agree, Nature has had enough, and the repurcussions will be disastrous. There is no second chance ....

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bang on. Couldn't have put it better. I hope that the powers that be stop investing in Nature as if it were a commodity, and become its custodian as they shd rightly be.... BUT .

    ReplyDelete
  3. We Indians simply do not respect nature. Not that we respect much else.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Very comprehensively encapsulated by Avay Shukla. His price proposal though, is probably low and asynchronous with his illustrations of prevailing profligacy and splurge. That of the Himachal government is anachronistic and woefully inadequate to introduce the desired change.
    Trekking across the delicate natural beauty of the land needs more than a spirit of adventure. It should be undergirded by responsibility, gratitude and humility towards nature. This indebtedness will best be shown and served monetarily, and will assist in the preservation of the local geography. Those tenacious to take these arduous hikes will need to be sound of mind, body and wallet to provision for environmental protection, personal safety, rescue measures and insurance back-up. Perhaps doubling Mr. Shukla’s prices per day per trekker will make a better rate card commensurate with the magnificence of the product. GST will stay with them even if the guide does not!
    Capping the number of excursionists is a sound idea whose time is overdue. The fragility of these landscapes is veneered under their beauty. Thrill seekers must fully comprehend that they are not conquering these geographies by touring them at will, but are gaining an experience esoteric and momentous by entry into these hallowed lands upon awaiting their turn.
    The twin measures of capping and pricing as suggested will inherently serve to reduce and resist future damage to the environment. Mr. Shukla’s advocacy for mandatory tourism and trekking breaks to allow nature to recuperate is a capital one, worth implementing. Is there then, need for the government to be restrictive upon those aspiring to reach higher altitudes?
    Finally, the task of aligning religious and spiritual peregrinations with nature’s compulsions of preservation, is herculean and seemingly without an answer. Avay Shukla was himself a meandering mendicant in another life, traversing these very landscapes...perhaps he can draw upon his transcendental past and provide salvation as well as solution!

    ReplyDelete
  5. That's a delicious dig in your last sentence, Mr Patankar- loved it! But you forget that there's another-nonbiological- being who also has laid claim to traversing the Himalayas, not in the transcendental past but in this very life (though this has yet to be verified, like his college degree). And he is intent upon destroying the precious Himalayas, what with his Char Dham road and rail projects, the four-lanings, hydel projects, airports and not so smart towns.
    On a more serious note, however, I am glad that most people agree with me, though that doesn't count for much. Because I don't expect the policy makers of Himachal (and here more blame rests with the bureaucracy than the politician) do do anything about correcting course. On the very day that this blog appeared the govt. has amended the TCP rules to allow construction of 20 storey buildings in the state! What more needs to be said?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. He of non-biological descent cares a melting snowflake for the Himalayas, as is evident from his unstoppable appetite for infrastructure enhancement in the region, heedless of geographical perils. But one must hold the incumbent CM of Himachal equally culpable for his display of collective federalism in this irrational exercise.
      Your style of humour, which is open to the occasional bout of thrust and parry, is appreciated. The ability to accept and disburse wit freely is possessed by a rare breed of individuals of biological origin.

      Delete
  6. I need the View from Kailash to interpret and explain today's news in Indian Express with the heading Registrstion, verification of migrant workers must in Shimla. On the one hand tourism is encouraged and if a tourist is charmed by the beauty of the Queen of the hills should that be encouraged?. Involving the district administration in this process is not progressive

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with you, Mr Raman: registration and "verification" by police is a retrograde move and a step further in the direction of a police state; it is also indicative of our class biases- it's never the well off who have to go thru this process, only the marginalised. It may well be violative of the constitution too- if an Indian citizen has the right to live and work in any part of the country, then why impose this restriction on him? Why treat him like a potential criminal without any cause? Where is the data to show that "immigrants" and "migrants" are more prone to commit crimes than the state's native residents? I am afraid the Himachal govt. is caving into Hindu extremist pressure, which is sad. For Himachal offered the Congress a chance to show-case a truly secular, inclusive and bias-free society, one in which religions are respected but not pandered to, where all citizens are treated equally, and where the law is the same for all. It could have been an alternative to the BJP's illiterate, hate-filled, legally suspect model. Unfortunately, the Congress is failing this test and its Chief Minister, inspite of having a dozen expensive Advisors, is bereft of any vision. He will, of course, pay the price for his vacillation and fence-sitting come the next elections, but that will be no tragedy: the real tragedy will be that a once peaceful state, where all sections and religions subsisted in harmony and accord, will have been injected with the communal poison.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The cash-strapped Himachal government in its desperation is planning to tax its residents on the number of commode seats they have in their houses! It is perhaps fiscally incommoded by the migratory menials and compelled to tax the lavatorial luxuries of the affluent. If the View from Greater Kailash supports such an influx, then it is monofocal in its vision and ingenuously commodious in its welcome.

    ReplyDelete