Amidst the ongoing cacophony of news and Deep Fake news, claims and counter claims, dissemination and dissembling, it is becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between fake and genuine democracies. What makes a country a real democracy? Is it a "progressive and liberal" Constitution? An "independent" judiciary? A "fearless" press and media? An "elected" government? An "independent" civil service? On paper, yes, but in reality these attributes are neither sufficient nor enough to ensure a democratic government or a free society. This is being demonstrated to us on a daily basis right here at home.
For the sake of appearances, and press releases, India has all the attributes mentioned above but the reality is a different kettle of fish altogether. There is little point in listing out what has gone wrong with our Constitution, judiciary, press, civil services in recent years, for they are all well documented and known to those who care about such matters. For instance, retired Justice of the Supreme Court Rohinton Fali Nariman has listed out the four developments this year which have disturbed him most, the Supreme Court has yet to give any judgment of any consequence where it has spoken against the government at the centre, the Election Commission has become some kind of Philosopher's stone which can turn the ruling party's dross into the gold of victories, Parliament has become a vestigial appendage like the coccyx in the human body which has long outlived its utility and has to be cast aside, the civil services (and the defense forces) have either become camp followers of the ruling dispensation, or have hunkered down in their well cushioned burrows like the marmots in the More plains of Ladakh, the media is giving some serious competition to the oldest profession in the world. All these have become what Pratap Bhanu Mehta has termed a "pseudo constitutional facade" of parliamentary democracy. For the fact is that we are an eroding democracy and an uncaring society, and this can be best understood by a comparison with some other, more genuine, democracies. Comparisons are odious, but they are sometimes necessary to recognize our hidden ugliness. Just a couple of examples should suffice to make the point.
Take our government's and society's response to the Israel-Palestine conflict. Any criticism of Israel is not allowed: lectures are not permitted, protests are banned, police cases are filed against those who dare to put up posts on social media. The media will not show both sides of the story, celebrities and influencers are conspicuously silent, all in thrall of the government's support for the settler-colonial policy of Israel and its allies in the developed world. But in the same developed world, and indeed within Israel itself, there are no restrictions on the expression of the wide- spread anger against Israel. Biden is being condemned in the US media daily for supporting the slaughter in Gaza, even his State Deptt. officials are staging a kind of mini revolt, expressing their dissent through the "dissent line" created for feedback. Public opinion is turning against him. In November, journalists with the BBC protested against their own management for being selective in its coverage of the war, dehumanising Palestinians and failing to show the Israeli atrocities. The Universities are pushing back against their pro-Israel funders who want to rein in the anti-Jewish sentiments on the campuses, and at least one President has resigned. Public protests are being staged in the UK, France, Germany, Australia, Canada demanding an immediate cease-fire in Gaza. None of these governments can even consider suppressing these protests, and sooner or later, these will have their effect on the policies of these countries. This is how genuine democracies give voice to their citizens' concerns against their own governments turning rogue.
The London Metropolitan police recently provided another example of how real democracies work. Various organisations had planned a massive march in support of Palestine on Armistice Day last month. The Home Secretary and the government of Uncle Tom (brazenly pro-Israel)wanted the police to deny permission for it, the Police Commissioner refused, on the grounds that there was no threat to law and order and he could not legally ban the march. Braverman went public on the issue, accusing the London Police of partisanship and selective favouritism. The Commissioner stood his ground, the march went ahead peacefully, the only arrests were of some right wing elements who attempted to disrupt it. And guess what? There was so much anger and outrage against Braverman that, a couple of days later, Sunak had to sack the Home Secretary. THIS is how democracies work, not like our own police who have become like private militias of any ruling party, whether at the Center or in the states.
Our defense Chiefs are looking increasingly like men of straw, notwithstanding their impressively resplendent uniforms, with more stars than in the Milky Way. They have been silent even as the political executive has run rough shod over their decades old culture and ethos, changing their regimental traditions, ranks, uniforms, mode of recruitment, perhaps even interfering in operational and tactical matters. And now, we are told, some of these retired worthies may even be attending the inauguration of the Ram Mandir, a politico-religious event, further eroding the apolitical and religion-neutral ethos of our armed forces. Compare this with the stance adopted by General Milley, the Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, who resisted every move by Trump to use the military to stay on in power. He made his reservations clear to the White House and almost resigned in June 2020, but then told his staff: " If they want to court-martial me or put me in prison, have at it....I will fight from the inside."
Real democracies, as opposed to fake ones. respect their citizens' sentiments, do not suppress them by the use of force, and have robust institutions and civil societies that stand up and be counted at critical moments. We are not yet a fake democracy, but we are getting there fast. Democracies do not die at the hands of governments alone: when public conscience and opinion dies, so do democracies.
Retired Justice of the Supreme Court Rohinton Fali Nariman and Pratap Bhanu Mehta are known critics of the present dispensation. It is not necessary for the Supreme Court to come out against the Government to prove its independence. All its rulings are supported by logic and precedence. The Election Commission could not hand out victories to the ruling party in HP, Karnataka and Telangana. Indian Parliament was always subservient to the ruling party; that is the constitutional framework. Most English medium channels can be said to be sympathetic to the ruling party. But robust opposition is mounted against the Government by several Hindi, regional and YouTube channels. The deficiencies of Indian democracy can be traced to widespread poverty and lack of awareness among the people.
ReplyDeleteThere is no ban on criticizing Israel on its ongoing conflict with Hamas. No one has been punished for criticizing Israel or siding with the Palestinians. India has reaffirmed its support for the Palestinian cause in recent years. Modi became the first Indian Prime Minister in 2018 to visit Ramallah in the occupied West Bank. India has increased its donations to the U.N. Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East. India has a complicated and nuanced stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Suella Braverman was the sole disruptor in the British cabinet. NYT had reported on 09.11.2023: “One of Britain’s most senior cabinet ministers, Suella Braverman, has triggered political turmoil by writing a newspaper article that attacked the country’s largest police force over its approach to a pro-Palestinian protest, and implicitly challenged the authority of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. One of Britain’s most senior cabinet ministers, Suella Braverman, has triggered political turmoil by writing a newspaper article that attacked the country’s largest police force over its approach to a pro-Palestinian protest, and implicitly challenged the authority of Prime Minister Rishi Sunak. … The article has created a dilemma for Mr. Sunak, who on Thursday appeared to be weighing whether to keep his disruptive home secretary in her job.” Suella’s sympathy with Israel may be for the reason that her husband, Rael Braverman, is Jewish. Rishi Sunak has fired her from the British cabinet. In a biting letter of Suella on 14.11.23 the first sentence was: “Thank you for your phone call yesterday morning in which you asked me to leave government. While disappointing, this is for the best.”
I sometimes wonder if Mr. P.K.Sahu actually believes everything he writes in defence of this government?
ReplyDeleteBut you haven't countered any of the points that he has made above! Your criticism is more of a slander!!
DeleteYes; wisest to be aligned with the winning side. Like the conversation on the battlefield between a wise old general and a fresh young lieutenant:
ReplyDeleteLieut: We are sure to win Sir; God is on our side!
Gen: yes, but in my experience, God has always been on the side of the bigger guns!
Considering that we are at what could only be described as a nadir, I do keep wondering whether it could even be possible that we could sink further. And then this lot simply lifts the septic tank we are already wallowing in and finds still worse muck to plaster us with.
ReplyDeleteCry, The Beloved Country!
Politcization of Armed Forces is worrisome.Wish someone like a former Army Chief would be bold enough to remove bangles and let the Govt know that most personnel are increasingly concerned about governance shenanigans.
ReplyDeleteAvay Shukla’s rubric of evaluating our democracy is perhaps overtly objective, and his touchstones of gauging governance are abrasive to those disinclined with him, as Mr. Sahu’s retaliatory missive bears out. His endline, one fears, may come prophetically true if we continue to pursue the current path of unconcern, or choose to stay zombified by the style of democracy served.
ReplyDeleteBut the quandary is this:
The people make the government which shapes a democracy, and their will prevails through the ballot. They have willed in favour of this regime and the style of its governance. If this dispensation scores poorly on Avay Shukla’s classificatory scale, then the way to remedy it is also through the ballot.
Will there be a change this time?
Food for thought.
Rather I feel India is on the right track. It's in the best space. I think common man is happy and he shows that by voting.
ReplyDeleteToo many people are letting things go because they are not targeted. Reminds me of Germany in the 1930s when the public kept quiet - Jews, Press, Socialists and finally it was the common Herman. Hope we don't end like Germany.
ReplyDeleteSomebody has to sing about the dark times while living in it.Mr. Sukla has been doing that with courage. . Sometimes the smallest voice can make the bigger bang. Power to his voice!
ReplyDelete