Add this

Friday 13 October 2023

DHAN KI BAAT

 I should have listened to Mintu, ten years my senior, way back in 1973. If I had, I wouldn't be living in a village near Mashobra, waiting with bated breath for my pension every month, hoping the Treasury Officer doesn't question my Life Certificate which states: "Brain dead but still breathing and smoking Wills Flakes." I'd be rubbing shoulders in Kensington Gardens or a Bangkok penthouse with the Nirav Modis and the Vijay Mallyas of the world, handing out lavish tips to ravaging beauties, all debited to the Bank of Punjab or Baroda, as the (suit)case may be. I'd better explain.

In the Delhi university of 1973 you couldn't take a girl for a "band omlette" to Khyber Pass unless you had a Jawa mobike between your knees, its exhaust sawed off in some reverse phallic ritual. Lumbering through my final year MA (no, Mr. Narendra Modi was not my class mate) I petitioned my nearest living ancestor for a loan for a bike. Now, my Dad sold oil (Burmah Shell) for a living and was harder to pin down than an oil slick. Like Mamta Bannerji I kept hoping for the funds but they never came. Fed up of waiting and seeing a life of enforced celibacy awaiting me, I decided to take matters into my own hands and sat for the SBI Probationary Officers' Exam. To everyone's great surprise I made it, but then developed second thoughts: I'd always wanted to sit for the IAS. Enter Mintu, to whom I went for advice. Now, Mintu was the hot shot in the extended Shukla tribe, a go-getter in a multinational company. " Take it!" he ordained. " Why ?" I sought to know.
" A bank job," said he of the unlimited expense account, " is worth dying for. The fortunate guys can play around with their own money, but only the blessed play with other people's money. That's what you'll be doing for the next 35 years, you know(give or take a few years of suspension and jail time). You can borrow as much money as you want. Remember, a borrower never dies- he just loses interest."
I didn't heed Mintu's Delphic advice and now have the next 15 years in village Puranikoti to regret it. I have an aversion to taking loans, believing implicitly in the old adage: Neither a loaner nor a loanee be. A mistake which I ascribe to a double promotion between Nursery and KG II, which made me miss the other adage which Nirav Modi, Vijay Mallya and Lalit Modi, et al. learned by heart in KG I: " A buck in the hand is worth two in the Bank." I guess I better explain this paranoia also.                                                                           I have had this great suspicion of loans ever since my Dad visited me when I was posted as SDM Chamba in 1976. Now, my Dad used to make a smooth transition from oil to alcohol every evening, scotch on the rocks. I had no rocks since , with a salary of seven hundred rupees a month, I could barely afford to keep my wife in clothes (not a bad thing when you're just married, but you get the drift), and therefore had no fridge. My Dad immediately directed me to buy one, saying he would put up the money for it. It was an (All)wyn-win situation. He went back to Kanpur after a few stiff ones on the rocks, had some second thoughts of his own, and informed me that the Rs. 4000 he had advanced to me was not a grant, but a loan. It was my Ashok Gehlot moment. I borrowed money from the District Nazir to repay my Dad and decided never to take a loan again.
But life has a way to make you eat your words. Suddenly, retirement loomed over the horizon and I realised that soon I would no longer have a leaking "sarkari" roof over my head. At about the same time my younger son Saurabh discovered Madhusudan Das ("Indian universities are the slaughter houses of intelligence") and decided to study in London. So I polished up my begging bowl and went with it to my bank manager for two loans: house and education. I got the loans but not before the bank had squeezed out every drop of information about me: a data extortion even Facebook would be envious of- salary slip, GPF statement, land revenue papers, default guarantee from employer, architect's plan. If I recollect it also took from me my horoscope ( to ascertain that I would live long enough to repay the loans), blood reports(to check whether I had AIDS), my ACR dossier (was I likely to be dismissed from service before repayment of the loan ?), an IQ test report for Saurabh to satisfy itself that he was intelligent enough for further studies (that was a close one), and perhaps even a report on my sperm count (to be sure that the bank would get a bang out of its buck- it didn't, nothing lowers the testosterone more effectively than two EMIs a month ).                                                                                                                                                                                                  After that experience I have never applied for a loan, not even a credit card or a post-paid mobile account, because I can't bear the thought of OWING money to anyone. A big mistake, because the only way you can get uber rich in India is by borrowing big time, and not returning the moolah. In this blessed country if you owe a bank ten thousand rupees it's your problem, but if you owe it ten thousand crores then it's the bank's problem! Just look at the couple of dozen bankruptcy cases before the NCLTA: while all the banks and depositors are taking what is called "haircuts" (but are more like fiduciary castrations) in the thousands of crores of rupees, the defaulters continue to live the life of the Sultan of Brunei. So, if you want to live the big life, go and borrow money- in crores. As the Duchess advised the ageing Duke: " If you can't raise it, you ain't getting no piece !" Which, by the way, appears to be a slight adaptation of that Confucious gem: Man who quarrel with wife get no piece at night.                                                                                             Which is also why I live in a village, doing Yoga when the sun rises and meditating when it sets. In between I think of Nirav Modi standing on tip toe peering down designer cleavages, of Vijay Mallya and his life membership of the Mile-High Club, of Lalit Modi who still appears to have the government by the  (cricket) balls, of the captains of Indian industry at Davos in their  bespoke suits which have no pockets- they don't  need pockets, because their hands are always in someone else's pockets, you see. Maybe I should have listened to Mintu. 

14 comments:

  1. What a riot of a piece! I guess the option cookie crumbles somewhere between 'der aaye darust aye" and "ab kaahe ko rowey jab chidiya chug gai khet"! Mintu's sound advice is very likely to be ignored even today since the IAS option is believed to be Alladin's lamp for reasons virtuous and otherwise. Until now one embossed one deep pockets! I am wiser after reading the logic of bespoke suits being pick pocketed! Enjoyed every word.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ha Ha!!!
    The ultimate 'finger' in your piece is "..... of Nirav Modi standing on tip toe peering down designer cleavages". Brilliant!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for setting me right. In my first reading of that sentence I didn't see the comma after 'cleavages. Was surprised to read about "Nirav Modi standing on tip toe peering down designer cleavages of Vijay Mallya"!

      Delete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "....that was a close one..." brought out a bray from me.
    But for sheer visual delight, Nirav Modi on tiptoe is, simply, beyond.
    Indi Khanna seconded.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Wonderful! Hysterically funny, loved it

    ReplyDelete
  6. Like wine, ribaldry gets better with age.

    The racy innuendos are spurting like frequent gushes than delayed dribbles blog after blog, evidently a case of rediscovered release. Of the mind. A layer of propriety on the top-soil of the narrative keeps it from being labelled salacious. Dig a bit and the loamy mounds of double entendres surface. And the readers know that Avay Shukla is riding in top gear!

    As an afterthought, I would have enjoyed Mintu and Father find a place in his latest book "The Deputy Commissioner's Dog...." Mintu for tutoring the art of minting unlimited money, and Father for changing son's fungible status from grantee to loanee with the diminishing effect of the scotch. Perhaps in the revised edition….

    ReplyDelete
  7. Laughing all the way like a bookie on the run!

    ReplyDelete
  8. # you, probably, are the perfect seer to expound on our chattering classes, aka radical left, socialists, class warfare skilled practitioners, having without exception not questioned the extreme, criminal cynicism of yankeestan selecting a credit card merchant to head the world bank, viz. 'the international development organization that has been created to reduce poverty by lending money to the governments of its poorer members to improve their economies and to improve the standard of living of their people'. even as a very junior babu you sent in a chit to the district nazir to trouser an advance amounting to almost six times your month's salary from the district treasury babu. there would have been an interesting entry in the out of account cash note-book drawing down on the balances of cash in hand. hanky panky for the heaven born is probably the best baptism to a lifetime of living off the fat of the land even for those without sticky fingers and then superannuating to an urban village gated community shown on the revenue records as a rural billage.

    ReplyDelete
  9. By George! The IAS is undeniably despised in some quarters, isn't it!! Or is the disapprobation focused to one individual...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Brilliant as always. Tongue-in-cheek as always. Yes, Nirav gets my vote too. Laage raho munna bhai, you fill our mundane lives with much needed mirth in these very trying times. Look forward always for your gems & they never fail to sparkle

    ReplyDelete
  11. Brilliant piece with 'cleavages' off and on for a hearty musing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's probably both, Mr. Patankar, reasons unknown. Mr. Ninan has been commenting on just about every blog for the last few months. He appears to be full of negativity, vitriol and a (personal?) animosity towards me, though I have never met him or corresponded with him in this life at least. I have given him a long rope as the right to speak out, disagree and criticize is one of the values dearest to my heart. But I'm afraid he is now crossing the line between criticism and trolling, and that is not something that adds value to my blogs. I have been criticized, and found fault with, more times than I can recollect, and have welcomed it, for such comments invariably add depth to the blogs and have resulted in stimulating discussions. Not only the readers of this column, but even I benefit from the exchange of contrary views. But Mr. Ninan is misusing this licence by venting his spleen and animus in his comments. This is not the forum for doing so- he would be well advised to move on to Twitter/ X or Y to unload his personal grudges. Let me put it this way- the next time he indulges in trolling (of any individual, class or community) I shall lose no time in blocking him and deleting his comments even without reading them. Allowing him to continue with his irrelevant vilification of the world at large would be doing a great disservice to other interlocutors and readers.
    I do hope Mr. Ninan gets to see these comments, and takes them in the spirit they are written.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. While I concur that Mr. Ninan has been consistent in insulting the bureaucracy, and this occasion has chosen to get personal, I feel he should be permitted to vent his mind, guts, spleen and other parts of his anatomy as he feels are allowable for exhibit.
      Simply because he writes with a style that is admirably different from the rest of your followers, making it - if I may say at the risk of appearing perverse - "enjoyable" to read his comments for their strokes, and not their intent.
      Another reason that Mr. Ninan should remain unshackled to comment on your blogs is in order that the readers get a diametrical - and mostly tangential! - perspective to the topic you've written on, like the other side of the coin. And enable them to decide for themselves which side of the coin must land for them. If I were you, I would urge Mr. Ninan not to hold back, but unleash himself with greater ferocity so that Avay Shukla the reader, along with the rest of us, gets the opportunity to come to sight Mr. Ninan's frames of reference. His spiels are acidic to almost everything you write about; your readers are provisioned with gray matter adequate to conclude for themselves whose views to draw their inferences from. There is thus no need to block him.
      Roll the dice, by George!!

      Delete