Although it looks more unlikely every passing day we may yet bumble our way through this corona crisis, but it will be through an extra large dose of luck ( high temperatures, native immunity, a weakened strain of the virus, younger demographics) and the police danda rather than because of our health preparedness and systems. Eight weeks into the lockdown and we are still to find answers to faulty testing kits, lack of PPE for health care staff, overflowing hospital beds and inadequate testing. Because, let's face it- over the years successive governments have run our public health and medical infrastructure to the ground, and deaths of hundreds of children every year by the easily treatable AES ( Acute Encephalitis Syndrome) in UP and Bihar are proof of this. We can easily find the money for bullet trains, hikes in MPs' salaries, bail outs for corporates, disfigurement of the India Gate lawns, but somehow never manage to find the funds for improving our fourth world health systems.
Against the WHO recommendation of 3.5 to 4.0 % of GDP we have provided only 1.6% in the current year ( it was 1.41% in 2008). Even the govt's own advisors ( 15th Finance Commission) had recommended that it should be at least 2.5% or Rs. 145,000 crore against the paltry Rs. 70000 crore provided this year. We have 0.7 beds per thousand population against the WHO recommendation of 3.5, are short of 1.50 million doctors and 2.40 million nurses ; worse, 80% of those available are in urban areas. There were only 20000 ventilators in the whole country when this crisis began. The basic building blocks of health care- PHCs and CHCs- suffer from a shortfall of 22% and 30%, respectively, and 90% of them do not meet the Indian Public Health Standards: 6 out of 10 PHCs have only one Doctor. We are extremely fortunate that, thanks to the luck factor and military style curfews, our broken down health system has not yet been tested by the kind of numbers in America and Europe, for then the consequences would be catastrophic.
The present govt. has done little beyond formulating eponymous acronyms. It has done little to start providing the Rs. 1.65 trillion required to upgrade our health system to WHO levels ( PWC study in 2017). Worse, it appears to have decided to hand over the responsibility of public health to the private sector. It will hand over between Rs. 15000 crore to Rs. 20000 crore every year to private hospitals and insurers( under Aayushman Bharat) instead of using that money to improve its own primary and tertiary care institutions; a proposal is under consideration to transfer district level hospitals to private entities; the govt's own CGHS and EGHS facilities are little more than dispensers of patent medicines- for anything of any consequence the patient is referred to a private hospital, at a cost to the govt., of course.
These private and corporate hospitals have no concept of public service and are in the game only for the maximum that they can gouge out of the govt. and the poor patient. Patients under Aayushman Bharat will receive some level of undignified treatment, the rest will be bled of their savings and pushed below the poverty line. The private health sector has been thoroughly exposed in the age of the Corona. Even in these distressing times they have seized the opportunity to make some extra money: according to a report in the Times Of India dated May 11, 2020 the cost of treatment/ consultations in private hospitals has gone up by 25-30% in the last six weeks; the ostensible excuse is the cost of PPEs. Governments have done nothing to control this profiteering..
All, and I mean all, the heavy lifting is being done by the creaking public hospitals which are bearing the brunt of this crisis. Their staff continue to struggle on in spite of a massive resource crunch and even when they themselves get infected. The private ones simply turn away Covid patients or just shut down, citing lack of capacity or fear of infection. They put their own interests before that of the public, and since there is little profit to be squeezed out of the virus, they would much rather stay uninvolved or down their shutters. The govt's inability, or will, to involve them in this battle has been very well analysed in an article in THE WIRE by R.V.Barua and Ramila Bisht ( 24.4.2020). They reveal how the central govt. appears to be clueless about a national plan to coopt the private health infrastructure in the fight against COVID 19. The CEO of Aayushman Bharat, instead of compulsorily requisitioning their services under the Disaster Management Act, has simply "appealed" to them to cooperate in the effort! By now all large/ corporate private hospitals should have been commandeered by the govt. in this national crisis, and some of their staff deployed in govt. hospitals to assist the over stretched medical staff there. Only a couple of state govts. have started doing this now, on their own initiative.
Sitting on the sidelines, these money making entities nonetheless have the gall to demand financial "relief" from the government. FICCI has asked the govt. to give them a whole host of concessions, ranging from Income Tax benefits to GST exemptions to loan deferments to power tariff concessions. Their greed is beyond comprehension, at a time when hundreds of millions are simply struggling to survive. Their corporate vision is clear: make exorbitant profits when the going is good, raid the public exchequer when the going gets tough.
The writing is on the wall for our policy makers to see, whether or not it is in Devanagri script: public health is the core responsibility of any democratic government, even one which barely passes muster as one, like ours. It cannot be outsourced like an entertainment channel. The private sector deals in private profit, not public good; when the going gets tough, it gets going- in the opposite direction. Any responsible dispensation just HAS to find the moneys to fund public health infrastructure- beg, borrow, steal, print or, even better, jettison a few Quixotic fantasies. If Mr. Harshvardhan wants to learn how this is done, he doesn't have to trouble himself too much- just study the Kerala model.
Kerala was the first state to bear the brunt of COVID, and now it the first which can more or less claim victory over it. This did not come about by luck or egoistic acronyms or private sector benevolence, but by consistent and far sighted policies to strengthen local bodies, decentralisation of powers, and by investment in its health care systems, which were not hocked out to robber barons. Kerala spends 6.5% of its GSDP on health as against the Centre's 1.7%, in per capita terms Rs. 7636 as against the national average of Rs. 3800. In the aftermath of the attack by the NIPAH virus in 2018 it has spent Rs. 4000 crore to upgrade its public health systems. It has not taken the privatisation route but has prioritised the strengthening of primary and preventive care, a gradual shift to generic medicines. Its goal is to double public spending on health in the next five years. Globally also, the countries which have done the best against COVID- Canada, New Zealand, Cuba, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland - are those which have robust public health systems and infrastructure.
Kerala's active social conscience has also played a major role in containing the epidemic. While the rest of India was watching re-runs of Ramayan on TV, the government in Kerala was putting in place community kitchens, relief shelters for guest workers, strengthening its hospitals, setting up contact tracing teams, and opening up its public distribution system. It was the first state to announce a relief package, one that was people oriented and not intended to mollify corporates alone. The state is an example of what investment in health and social sectors, combined with an empathetic attitude, can deliver in times of crises.
Finally, waiting in the wings is another catastrophe, as pointed out by Akriti Singh in a wonderfully researched article in THE CITIZEN of 4th May ( CANCER HAS NOT STOPPED, BUT THE TREATMENT HAS). The article focuses on the plight of the millions of patients of other medical conditions who are being left untreated because of the government's exclusive( and short sighted) obsession with the more glamorous COVID. She cites ICMR's own data to show that during the lock down period, in the normal course, 300,000 fresh cancer patients would have been diagnosed, but have not been, because hospitals are either shut or dealing only with COVID cases. In addition, millions of other patients- not only of cancer but also of other life threatening ailments of the heart, kidneys, diabetes,- have been unable to access the treatments/ surgeries they normally could. Adhering to guidelines of the Health Ministry and AIIMS Delhi, hospitals are performing only 10% of their normal surgeries, supply lines of vital medicines have collapsed, radiation, dialysis and other therapies are just not available.
The Lancet magazine, in an article ( 5th May, 2020) has also raised the red flag. Quoting from the National Health Mission's own data, it states that in March 2020 there were 69% fewer vaccinations for measles, rubella and mumps as compared to the March 2019 figures; there were significant reductions for other conditions also: 21% for institutional deliveries, 52% for clinical interventions for acute cardiac events, and 32% for pulmonary interventions. These figures could have only deteriorated in April and May.
This neglect of routine health care may be because the governments are obsessed with COVID or because they realise that we do not have the capacity to handle both. That is a sorry comment on both our health infrastructure and on our lack of any short term planning and long term vision. In either case, this is a ticking time bomb which may result in a surge of non COVID fatalities in the months to come. Even if we defeat the virus it may well be a Pyrrhic victory.
Kerala's active social conscience has also played a major role in containing the epidemic. While the rest of India was watching re-runs of Ramayan on TV, the government in Kerala was putting in place community kitchens, relief shelters for guest workers, strengthening its hospitals, setting up contact tracing teams, and opening up its public distribution system. It was the first state to announce a relief package, one that was people oriented and not intended to mollify corporates alone. The state is an example of what investment in health and social sectors, combined with an empathetic attitude, can deliver in times of crises.
Finally, waiting in the wings is another catastrophe, as pointed out by Akriti Singh in a wonderfully researched article in THE CITIZEN of 4th May ( CANCER HAS NOT STOPPED, BUT THE TREATMENT HAS). The article focuses on the plight of the millions of patients of other medical conditions who are being left untreated because of the government's exclusive( and short sighted) obsession with the more glamorous COVID. She cites ICMR's own data to show that during the lock down period, in the normal course, 300,000 fresh cancer patients would have been diagnosed, but have not been, because hospitals are either shut or dealing only with COVID cases. In addition, millions of other patients- not only of cancer but also of other life threatening ailments of the heart, kidneys, diabetes,- have been unable to access the treatments/ surgeries they normally could. Adhering to guidelines of the Health Ministry and AIIMS Delhi, hospitals are performing only 10% of their normal surgeries, supply lines of vital medicines have collapsed, radiation, dialysis and other therapies are just not available.
The Lancet magazine, in an article ( 5th May, 2020) has also raised the red flag. Quoting from the National Health Mission's own data, it states that in March 2020 there were 69% fewer vaccinations for measles, rubella and mumps as compared to the March 2019 figures; there were significant reductions for other conditions also: 21% for institutional deliveries, 52% for clinical interventions for acute cardiac events, and 32% for pulmonary interventions. These figures could have only deteriorated in April and May.
This neglect of routine health care may be because the governments are obsessed with COVID or because they realise that we do not have the capacity to handle both. That is a sorry comment on both our health infrastructure and on our lack of any short term planning and long term vision. In either case, this is a ticking time bomb which may result in a surge of non COVID fatalities in the months to come. Even if we defeat the virus it may well be a Pyrrhic victory.
There are many lessons which the coronavirus is teaching us- on the nation's health, economy, environment, social equity. And we have to learn them fast, for the next corona is not far way. Are we willing to learn, own up to past mistakes and make mid-course corrections or will we continue to fly on a wing and a prayer till the inevitable crash landing?
Sometimes the throat runs dry. And the words stick.
ReplyDeleteBut Bong genes don't bow out easily - and -
ReplyDeletewhen at every turn you are confronted with a wall of denial, saying nothing is difficult too.
I don't know how much more needs to be said, or needs to be pointed out or simply just shown up to underline the state of the nation; left to the tender mercies of a monumental and collective ignorance.
Somebody may have said something like "arre kuch nahi yaar. Touch me raho lok bhi saaath deyenge...."
And so it has been since 2014. Stripped, shocked, the whole country walked, butt naked on the streets of the world.
Orchestrated by a Raj Band specialist whose propensity for theatrics and its generic untruths out-does any and every leader in any of more than 200 countries in the world in this last decade or so;
Reminiscent of Il Duce himself - for the copious content of misinformation and his pathetic conclusions thereof;
Of Mohammed Bin Tughlaq for the facile, short-lived, evaporative brilliance of muderous impulse;
Of Twentieth Century's own Little Corporal, Dear Adolf, for froth and swearing, thunderous chest thumping and promises unkept.
You could not hope for a more lucidly reliable and phonily respectable confluence of leadership. Especially conspicuous of late, for a telling absence.
All professionals retire when their usefulness has run its course. That should be true of the trappings of democracy as well.
leadership that has never cared (until brought to it somehow by a PR bunch) for anyone but the monied and the ruthless. Hallmarks, sure signs of a bully.
A man is indeed known by the company he keeps. And the poor, hurting, unfortunate people of the countries mentioned above, steered by crazy drivers in a circus tent, are exactly what the world faces now.
Their abusive fingers and tentacles invasive everywhere, stoking death.
Welcome to the present.
Spot on as always sir. Recognising the criticality of both health & education sectors in human development ranking most of the developed world ,especially Scandinavian countries, have 80% healthcare in the public domain leaving the private sector with only 29% room for monouvre thereby compelling them to compete for better service provisioning... Unfortunately the ratio here is reversed for very obvious reasons! Covid has held up a mirror... Yet all is not lost if even now the need for bolstering a decentralised healthcare system is nationwide finds centrestage!
ReplyDeleteHere is some more compulsory reading for the Cabinet. Will somebody please translate this article?? There is much, so much to learn from Kerala not just in the health sector but education and social equity and inter-religious getting along smoothly etc. etc. But states like Kerala are so far off from the Hindi heartland consciousness (and therefor successive Delhi governments) that i won't be surprised when many say "Kerala, where, what"!
ReplyDeleteNice analysis Avay! An ex- IAS yourself, you have in-depth knowledge and information about the Govt and it's functioning. Statistics are rarely trustworthy since they are released by the ruling party - even as you write and we read, there could be a big difference in data on which a particular issue is raised. You are a well read person and I presume that your readers are too - I for one - but the 543 Parliamentarians? You are probably in HP and I am in CG but the ground reality remains the same! India should produce more children so that the State can keep doling out more freebies and ensure their votes - this cycle will continue for the next hundred years but you and I may not be there to see Mera Bharat Mahaan ......
ReplyDeleteSo right Sir, public health in hand of private sector means crashing the system whatever is in place. I believe Delhi has also invested considerably in public health. But leaving public health to private sector will save a lot of money for Govt but will destroy the human capital and in long run it will damage the economy.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteDr. Subhash Chandra Pandey28 May 2020 at 18:10
It is a matter of personal opinion as to what should be the budget earmarked for health, education, defence, police, PDS, PMKY, NREGA, Highways, Railways, Power etc. Whether budget allocation for this or that is too low or too high is a matter of opinion.
However, misleading facts should not be put in public domain. The Rs.70000 crore figure is referring to about Rs.67000 crore provided in the latest Central budget for 2020-21.
For 2017-18, for which actual expenditure figures are available, the Central government expenditure on Health was Rs.53,114 crore and all States combined expenditure was Rs.1,29,658 crore. Central budget included Rs.30676 crore as Central grants to States. For Budget 2019-20, combined health budget of all States was Rs.197,378 crore and Central budget was Rs.64,559 crore including grants of Rs.29,454 crore to States.
Who is WHO to prescribe this or that % of GDP for health when government budget size varies so considerably in the world. In rich, OECD countries budgets may be as high as 50-55 per cent of GDP, Indian (Centre+States) budget is just about 27% of GDP of which one fourth is funded from borrowed money and interest payment is more than 4% of GDP.
The immediate crisis at hand should not make any stakeholder lose perspective and balance.
Yes, I agree we need to enhance public investment in healthcare sector and for that one needs well regulated scales of free/subsidized medicare or a wide base insurance driven financing model.
Sudden decisions without fully visualizing the enormity of the problem and their tardy implementation is landing us in a mess repeatedly. Shall we ever try to be wiser or keep believing that aggressive publicity is substitute of efficient performance ?
ReplyDelete