Friday, 21 June 2024

THE SLAPSTICK QUANDARY

 The last fortnight has not been a good one for Himachal's politicians. The Chief Minister, Mr. Sukhu, lived up to the promise he had shown as a child and lost all four Lok Sabha seats to the BJP. The late Chief Minister Raja Virbhadra's son, Vikramaditya Singh, will never be able to show his face in royal circles again, having lost miserably to a far-from-common commoner in the Mandi seat. Mr. Anurag Thakur of the BJP has been divested of his central Ministership. There is some speculation that the always smiling Mr. JP Nadda may have had something to do with it: he first moth- balled the father, and now the son. That now leaves only the Holy Ghost, the banarsi pan(jandrum), he of the Immaculate Conception, to deal with. As someone sang, to everything there is a time...And finally, the Himachal-ki-beti Kangana Ranaut was slapped in the kisser by a lady constable of the CISF (Central Industrial Slapping Force). (This, of course, solves the mystery of the recent deployment of the CISF for Parliament's security- perhaps the stigmata on Ms Ranaut's flaming cheek is a dress rehearsal of what Opposition MPs can expect from the CISF chappies in Parliament. Of course, Ms Ranaut herself is now safe- a lawyer friend tells me that slapping her again would amount to res judicata or double jeopardy, and would therefore not be allowed by My Lords if they ever return from their vacations. 

Coming back to the slapping, however; I feel a disclaimer is in order here: I abhor violence and do not condone it, except when it is inflicted on people I don't like. I do not dislike Ms Ranaut- how can the male of any species except perhaps the streptococcus?- but I do disapprove of many of her utterances and the ideas she stands for. She is a loudmouth and a motormouth whose natural instinct is to insult and abuse, like she did all those women at the farmers' protest. The CISF constable, Kulwinder Kaur, is the daughter of one of these women, and belongs to a proud community which does not believe in turning the other cheek- as Ms Ranaut's own flaming cheeks bear testimony to. To put it bluntly: Ms. Ranaut was asking for it and got what was due to her. If you want to lie down with dogs, expect to be bitten by a few ticks and fleas.

But she has her defenders: how can a person in uniform slap a woman?, they shout from their majoritarian ramparts. Really? What have persons in uniform not done to their country-men under the orders of this regime to which the lady from Mandi owes her allegiance? Have they not dragged women wrestlers (champions all) on the roads of Delhi and roughed them up while in uniform? Have they not burnt at midnight (without the consent of her parents) the corpse of a young Dalit girl, raped and killed by upper cast men, while in uniform? Have they not barged into the hostels and libraries of Jawaharlal Nehru University and Jamia Milia and mercilessly beaten students of both sexes without any reason, while in uniform? Have they not stood by and watched, for almost a year now, the atrocities being committed on the women of Manipur, while in uniform? Did not a railway policeman, while in uniform,  walk through a train coach, shooting members of a particular community with impunity? Please, all ye bhakts of various shades of saffron, spare us this drivel about uniforms. In the India of today a uniform is not a symbol of lawful forbearance, as it should be, it is a license for excess, accompanied by the Supreme Leaders's guarantee of complete immunity from the law. So what type of clothes Kulwinder Kaur was wearing when she planted the Congress symbol on Ms Ranaut's cheek is quite beside the point.

Welcome to public life, Ms Ranaut, and to the world of slippers, slaps and ink- ask Mr. Kejriwal, who has been slapped more times in public than by his mother as a child. Welcome also to the reality that sooner or later your past will catch up with you. One cannot make a career of foul mouthing individuals, abusing communities, vilifying particular religions, indulging in violence of the ideological and verbal kind, and not expect a pushback. This slapstick episode in which Kangana Ranaut plays the lead role has many subtle nuances, and all those who condemn Kulvinder Kaur without acknowledging these nuances are just being hypocritical and politically correct. Adopting a politically correct stance is the laziest response to a controversial situation. And, as Harry Truman so correctly remarked, political correctness is nothing but the deluded belief that it is possible to pick up a piece of shit by the clean end. Good luck, folks, in finding the right end!

11 comments:

  1. Kaur tarnished the image of CISF. Can't be accepted. It's a blot on CISF.
    And as expected she became darling of khalistani keeda Wale farmers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is your opinion. I am an ordinary person, far away in the southern direction from the imagined k-land, and my respect for CISF has increased by two notches!

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kangana Ranaut has a tendency to speak without thinking through the implications of what she's saying. I think she will act a lightning rod for liberal/opposition rage while the Great Man and his minions do what they do best--spread hate. Ans what you've said, Mr Shukla, about the misdeeds of those in uniform, is what we have seen.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As always, an enjoyable read, very fulfilling - this slapgate! 'As you sow, so you reap' rings in my ears like tinnitus. Also, like Greek tragedy, hubris is followed by nemesis! While condemning violence is politically astute and correct, don't provocative words too tantamount to violence? If so, what? Regardless of these niceties, this comeuppance KR simply can't delete!   

    ReplyDelete
  5. The slap did stick.
    It was symbolic of a deliverance from the non-biological descendant of God, who had unilaterally foisted upon the farmers of India his three commandments, the aftermath of which was bloody, torturous and took the lives of 750 protesting farmers, before their rescission.
    Kangana and Kulwinder, though not siblings, have displayed an astonishing sisterly similarity of temperament. One is a motor mouth of high decibels, the other a rotor hand of incredible dexterity. Both are unfettered by social and institutional restraint when exercising their abilities. They live in the moment, utterly unrepentant of the effect of their words or actions.
    The wicked amusement derived from Kangana being served her just deserts is deeply satisfying. Coming from a Kulwinder of diametrically opposite size, stature and social milieu makes it a befitting restoration of parity.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Also roughing up of old, unarmed and peaceful exservicemen for sitting at Jantar Mantar, by the uniformed capf men on orders of present RM.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Why were they sitting unnecessarily after making a mockery of medals. After getting OROP. Their pensions increased 3 folds. Congress didn't give OROP. BUT Modi still gets bricks from these habitual protesters

    ReplyDelete
  8. Justice Nyay Bindu is another case. She did for judiciary what Kaur did for CISF

    ReplyDelete
  9. Justice Nyay Bindu did to judiciary what Constable Kaur did to CISF

    ReplyDelete
  10. To everything there is a time...- A time for every purpose under the heaven. A time to embrace and a time to refrain from embracing..
    and slapping hard!

    ReplyDelete