Saturday, 17 October 2020

TRPs, CORPORATES, AND MORAL BANKRUPTCY

    Even for a country which is perpetually in outrage mode, the brouhaha over the TRP scandal takes the cake if not the bakery, as a colleague of mine who knows a thing or two about hot spots would put it. Experts- lawyers, advertising gurus,  doyens of journalism, film stars, celebrities ( everyone, that is, except Amitabh Bacchan who has too many bones in his mouth to be able to bark)- have been vocal about condemning something they all knew about ( and did nothing about) for decades. And as usual with TV experts, they have got it all wrong.

   The likes of Arnab Goswami, Rahul Shivshankar and Navika Kumar will now stew in their own juice for sometime, and one hopes the steaming will result in at least some of the toxins in them being flushed out. But they are not the only villains in the current TV eco-system of fake news, communalism and bigotry which masquerades as news in India today and which drives the TRP system. They are like brainless, amoral viruses which know only one thing- how to replicate and amplify their hate. The real villains are the hosts who provide shelter and sustenance to these viruses, but nobody is talking about them. I speak, of course, about their corporate sponsors, the companies which give them millions of rupees of advertising revenue, thereby enabling them to continue injecting their deadly poison into the social fabric of the nation. Hatred and bigotry gets TRPs, which in turn gets advertising revenue, which keeps this vicious cycle going. Without this money the cycle could not sustain itself.

   This last couple of weeks I've been indulging in a bit of masochism, watching Republic TV and Times Now, something which makes me sick. But I've been watching, not their programmes, but their ad breaks: the idea was to find out who their advertisers and sponsors are. As expected, it's a Who's Who of Indian industry, a veritable Rogues' Gallery of honchos who put money above conscience, perversely justifying something I've always noted- that in a sewer line it's the muck that floats at the top. Here's an illustrative list, compiled after hours of self inflicted torture:

REPUBLIC TV/ BHARAT: Raymonds, Muthoot Group, Jio, Max Bupa, Kent, Air India, Star Health Insurance, Nissan, Dabur, Mahindra, Amazon, Samsung, Sony, Maruti, Nerolac, Toyota.

TIMES NOW: Cadbury, Toyota, Hyundai, Nerolac, Birla Group, Amul, Skoda, Mercedes, Ceat, Samsung, Bluestar, HDFC, Sony, TCS.

   These are the corporates ( and others like them) which fund the toxicity, the hatred and bigotry, which our news channels spew out 24x7 and which has led to the TRP race. The total TV advertising spend is about Rs. 70000.00 crores every year, of which roughly 2% goes to the news channels. TRP determines which channel will get how much of this Rs. 1400 crore pie; according to current ratings, most of it goes to Republic, Times Now and India Today, all three of whom are these days waging an incestuous family battle to apportion blame, reminding me of a sight I witnessed in Masai Mara many years ago- a pack of hyenas turning upon each other. But this battle is throwing up enough of a dust cloud to conceal the culpability of our corporates.

   Why do these companies continue to fund these renegade channels? Surely they cannot  be unaware of the toxic and divisive content which is the mainstay of these channels? A corporate entity has the same legal rights as an individual, surely it should then have the same moral and social duties as an individual- to condemn immoral ideology, to abjure hate and communalism, to not incite one community against another, to distinguish between the truth and falsehood? And yet our corporates are blind to these responsibilities, just so long as they can get maximum eyeballs and continue to get a healthy return on investment. They are not bothered about the real return on their investment- a society and country being torn apart by the channels they fund.

   Our corporates aspire to be global entities but fail to espouse global values. In the developed world companies are increasingly taking positions on tech/ media platforms that spread fake news and incite hatred or violence. Facebook has been boycotted by the likes of Adidas, Diaggeo, Ford, Honda, HP, Hershey's, Coca Cola. Inexplicably, however, in India these same companies continue to do business with sections of our electronic media which are even more toxic and strident than Facebook. What is missing here is perhaps the pressure of a more active civil society.

   All responsible companies should boycott these venomous channels and civil society should mount pressure on them to do so, or face a boycott of their own products. A stirring of their conscience appears to have begun- just last week Bajaj and Parle announced that they will no longer advertise in some of these channels/networks because, as Rajiv Bajaj stated, I " do not want my children to inherit an India built on hate." Brave words, but then he is not known for mincing his words. The French car maker Renault has also been boycotting Republic TV and its Hindi mutant since May this year. But it did not do so out of any pricking of its conscience, but because of a campaign launched in France by Indian Alliance ( a group of diasporic Indians) with the hashtag  #RENAULT FUNDS HATE. The crusade was joined by Stop Funding Hate, another activist group in London, and by the French chapter of Sleeping Giants, a US based group which has been responsible for as many as 4000 companies withdrawing from BREITBART, a channel which is Mr. Trump's preferred purveyor of hate and racism.

   Unfortunately, the good work of these corporates has been somewhat undone by the Tatas and Tanishq this week by their withdrawal of an ad promoting inter faith marriage. This mighty conglomerate did not have the spine to stand up to the communal trolling for even one day! This supine surrender will only encourage the religious retards to further intimidate anyone who stands up for religious harmony. Notwithstanding his tall claims to philanthropy, Mr Ratan Tata always knows which side of his bread to butter, and this is usually the winning side. His action in not standing up for his convictions ( if he has any, that is ), along with the fact that his group continues to fund these toxic channels, has demolished all the principles that his predecessors stood for. But I'm still hopeful that not all of Indian industry belongs to the invertebrate genus and that more will follow the example of Bajaj, Parle and Renault.

   The lesson which emerges from the TRP implosion, therefore, should be that it is not only that channels like Republic and Times Now should be boycotted, but that the pressure and the boycott should extend also to those members of India Inc. who continue to support them with advertisements. For corporates too are citizens of this country and should be judged as such. It's bad enough for them to cosy up to the government, but must they also jump into bed with bigots, mercenaries and fanatics? Surely, there are better ways of making money than by pandering to the mob on prime time TV. Our captains of industry may do well to harken to the words of John Ruskin:

" You may either win your peace or buy it; win it by resisting evil, buy it by compromising with evil. "

22 comments:

  1. It pleases me no end that we have abandoned TV. Haven't watched since December 2017 and missed nothing.
    After a longish period of not reading newspapers, we have lifted that self-imposed embargo though with conditions.
    And last week I deactivated my Facebook Account. (Got out of Twitter and Linked-in ages ago).
    I am hoping Banks and others will revert to 'personal banking' as it used to be and that mobile phones will out-technology themselves and become good for calls and texts only - of Whatsapp like capability - the only 'app' that is, and can be, good for quick, painless communication.
    And that everything else is jettisoned into some other pocket sized device.
    At the moment unprincipled solicitation and connivance affect all with impunity. The newspapers are a ridiculous example of a living oxymoron. Weeping for the environment and at the same time adding pages and pages of bilge. Ruled by a Walrus and Carpenter hypocrisy. How many trees killed per paper I wonder.
    And needless to mention but the TATA capitulation was a truly bitter blow. There was a time when Mr. Rattan Tata said to Ms. Mamta Banerjee in Singur, if you hold a gun to my head you will have to either take it away or pull the trigger. Because I won't budge.
    Don't know who budged or not but so much for brave words.
    I think public boycott is the way to go - from netas to news service. Stop using so revenue dries.
    And therefore TRP too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Way to go! Our family too stopped watching news channels. First time TV went silent during SSLC exams of our son, 25 years ago. The feeling was so good, we did not replace our TV when it conked. Finally bought a smart TV last month, to watch movies only.

      Delete
    2. Your blogs are a sumptuous feast. Your grasp over the facts, the wit and humour, the gall and guts (such a rarity these days), and the sting and punch that you pack in your outpourings in elegent luminous prose makes each of them so exquisite and special. I find savouring their beauty, aroma and grace, word by word, sentence by sentence- an exercise that is nourishment for the mind and music for the heart. Each blog of yours speaks eloquently of your courage of conviction, integrity, strength of character, erudition and superb penmanship, making me both fond and jealous of you!
      In the present blog, you have thrown searing light on the toxicity of hate and bigotry being spewed out by some "amoral", lucre-hungry TV channels in cahoots with the unscrupulous corporates. I loved your apt and pithy comment on the silence of Amitabh Bachhan as also the caving in of Ratan Tata. It couldn't have been described better. Keep it up sir. More power to your brilliant and lucid pen!

      Delete
  2. Congress lackey fails to mention IndiaToday who are the real culprits of corruption and extortion. After all why should the writer feel so bad about his boss being called Antonia Maino, is that not the name Rajiv would have called her do lovingly ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. असल में इंडियाटुडे कांग्रेस के टुकडो में पल रहा इसलिए नाम कैसे लेंगे !

      Delete
    2. Excellent piece of explaining the present poison and hate being spread by these useless people who call themselves journalists.Very well written.Keep on the good work.

      Delete
    3. The article is totally one sided view!!! Majority of the population feels differently. You can write these articles and share them along your friends who are in your thinking zone...but this has no larger impact not does it have facts. The truth is Indian media was so long had a death grip by liberals ...now nationalists are being vocal . You may disagree but the truth shall prevail!!! Please brace yourself to be sidelined.

      Delete
  3. After the first comment what a disappointment to read the usual trolling comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolute trolling comment. I cringe at the use of Antonio Mano to a lady who has accepted India wholeheartedly through the years. But so typical.
      . What a beautiful blogpost — and what to typical troll comment.😐

      Delete
  4. Why is my comment darkened?😡

    ReplyDelete
  5. Expecting corporates to have a conscience is the height of naivete.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Replies
    1. Your comment on this excellent article goes to show your lack of comprehension of the language it's written in.

      Delete
  7. I think a major reason cited by Tatas to withdraw the Hindu-Muslim marriage AD was to protect the hapless employees of Tanishq stores across the country (as we saw on TV) from RSS/ Shiv Sena goons protected by the unquestioned political acceptance they enjoy under the present dispensation. And in the process a LOT of gold jewelry would have got looted. We all know what the police does in far serious criminal cases like riots, rapes, mini mob lynching etc. where the victims are from a minority. So, withdrawing the AD is sagacity, the better part of valour. Of course the Tatas need to forthwith stop sponsorship of TV channels that thrive on communal hatred. There is another worry too. Have we noticed the educated middle class silence on Hathras, the other rapes, the Tanishq AD, the Rhea C episode etc. etc.?? Only school-college kids offer a ray of hope, here and there.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The channels jumped on the band wagon without accertainig fact was stupid, specially Rahul Kanwal was diplorable.they have enhanced Republic n Bharat viewership. And condemned themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Avay Shukla, very readable as usual.

    The TRP scandal is a special issue, in fact local to Mumbai. It could be real, or it could have been engineered by the local government.

    But the point that Shukla has not delved into is much bigger and more universal.

    Why does hate and fear lead to greater viewership ?

    This is a problem we grapple with in connection to Fox.

    Why won't people equally or in greater numbers, flock to reason, science and commonsense ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. People do not flock in greater numbers to reason, science and commonsense exactly because these require deeper thinking and application of mind leading to an elevated sense of values. It is so much easier to appeal to the baser instincts of hate, narrow nationalism - my country, right or wrong - and religious bigotry. And that is why the BJP which champions such sentiments is sweeping to power in this country from end to end. The blame for the erosion of higher values squarely rests with the Congress Party which over the years has sacrificed the noble principles of our founding fathers at the altar of the expediency of clinging to power at all costs, including naked corruption, favouritism and patronage. It is they who have betrayed the nation

      Delete
    2. For some reason, I can see the response to me by Ramesh Ramachandra on my cellphone but not on my desktop. I think the way blogspot.com handles postings is a bit buggy.

      The reason I mention this is because some readers may be able to see MY response, but not the message from Ramesh Ramachandra which I am replying to, and therefore may think I am carrying on a conversation with myself!

      Ramesh, you have two points:

      1. People find it easier to adopt baser values of hate and disharmony.

      2. Congress is responsible for the erosion of higher values.

      I have to point out that the two ideas above make your reply internally inconsistent and contradictory. The second point implies that the higher values existed before the Congress era, which is unlikely, given the first point above.

      You therefore need to rethink your post.

      Delete
  10. Alas, Avay, we are all tainted: all of us are wallowing in the same muck, "lost souls living in a fish bowl" (Roger Waters would understand).
    To find the answer to your questions "Why do these companies continue to fund these renegade channels? Surely they cannot be unaware of the toxic and divisive content which is the mainstay of these channels?" - I would commend you to the book titled "Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business (1985)" by educator Neil Postman. And do watch'The Social Dilemma' to understand why not it's not just politicians and governments but media, marketers, advertisers, corporates, activists, everybody who loves a world divided by hate and with the attention spans of a tweeting sparrow.
    And a sobering thought: you and I have created this world...

    ReplyDelete
  11. What a brilliant piece of work. i agree with you sir, we need to call out the bigotry of corporate india.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I like your blog on this topic is well-written and original. Your information is really interesting to all readers. Hope you continue to keep up with this blog and will provide us some more information like this.

    Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

    ReplyDelete