Saturday 18 May 2019

CONFESSIONS OF A BOOKWORM.


   Hazaribagh in Bihar in the early 1960s. I was ten when I first got to know Dr. Binoy Chatterjee: I don't know how old he was, but he looked pretty old to me because when you are ten everyone beyond forty looks like he is a centenarian. Dr. Chatterjee was our family doctor (he even treated our pet bull-terrier), a homeopath, and I don't think he charged us even a penny for those white pills he handed out. He was a big, burly man but I think he had some problems with his feet because they were always heavily bandaged and he never stepped out of his house. Why do I remember him after almost 60 years? Because he introduced me to the wonders of the English language and the habit of reading.
  I was studying in St. Xavier's, Hazaribagh, and as you can imagine, we were given a constant overdose of the classics and Wren and Martin and Palgrave there. These did not, however, excite Dr. Chatterjee much. "Abhoy," he used to counsel me in that rolling Bengali accent which in later days Mamata Banerjee transformed into a rolling-pin, "classical literature is useful, but it puts the English language into a strait-jacket. Na, baba, it makes it too serious. Language must be fun, you should be able to play with it like a puppy with a ball; it should be capable of many meanings, like the fleeting glance of a beautiful woman." I saw what he meant, vaguely; I had a puppy at home and every woman looked beautiful to me, but each in a different way. And so the good doctor took it upon himself to initiate me into the unfettered world of an English language that could convey the joy of living, and not just its grim tragedies.
  Leave the classics in school, he told me sternly, and plied me instead with Mark Twain, Steinbeck, Oscar Wilde, James Hadley Chase, Perry Mason, Bennet Cerf, JJ Hunter, Jim Corbet, Max Brand, Billy Bunter, Zane Grey, Manohar Malgaonkar, Alistair Maclean, Spike Milligan, Richard Gordon  (the Doctor series), even the first edition of Fitzgerald's Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam! He had the most wonderful collection of books, all carefully packed in cartons, catalogued and indexed. On top of his list was P.G.Wodehouse- Dr. Chatterjee considered him the greatest exponent of the living English language. There were many others whose names are now lost in the mists of time. The prescription was simple: one's reading must be eclectic, every genre is as important as the next, if reading is not fun then it's a waste of time. And then there were the magazines: back issues of Punch, Reader's Digest, Imprint and a glossy precursor of the National Geographic whose name I now cannot recall. The good Jesuit fathers at school would have been horrified to see my weekly reading list. And I didn't have to buy a single book: Dr. Chatterjee had trunk loads of these books and disbursed them to me lovingly, after conducting a short viva voce on each book returned by me!
   The good doctor's bug made me a bookworm for life. My family moved to Calcutta, where my grandfather had two bookshops in New Market and one in the Grand Hotel. I soon struck a Trumpian deal with him: during my school/college holidays I would hang out at the shops, help in selling the books(for which I received a commission of four annas per book), and spend the rest of the time devouring as many more as I could. I could never afford to buy a new book, of course, having started life on a pocket money of five rupees a month, which subsequent inflation took to twenty five in my college days. So one scoured College Street in Calcutta, Navin Market in Kanpur and the Red Fort/ Chor Bazaar markets in Delhi in later life for second hand books. I still have them- handsome, leather bound books picked up for as little as eight annas in those pre-globalisation days. Till today I cannot buy a book at its printed price- it has to be either a discounted Amazon one, or a Book Fair offering, or a gift!  Old habits, like old Gods, die hard.
   During this journey from Mulk Raj Anand to Bill Bryson, however, I have picked up quite a few quirks and oddities of behaviour. During my younger days I was not beyond filching a book or two from a bookshop when in a severe state of penury, which was most of the time; the SOP was quite simple, really: walk in with three books and walk out with four, the desired title sandwiched between the others. Fortunately, this phase didn't last long, thus preventing me from becoming the head librarian in Tihar jail. I don't like people borrowing books from me: I consider it an invasion of my private space and akin to borrowing someone's girl friend. I hoard newly bought books and defer reading them for as long as I can. It's like these tomes are my capital, a kind of fixed deposit, and reading them would amount to breaking the FD and depleting this precious stock. So at any given time I always have ten or fifteen unread books on my shelves and feel the richer for it.
   My sons have strenuously tried to introduce me to Kindle and digital reading, without success. How does one explain to them that a book is a living entity and not a jumble of algorithms? That it must feel good to the touch; smell of paper, ink and time; fondly remind one of where and when it was bought (or filched); enable one to make notes on the margin? How does one convey the pleasure of physical possession, or the occasional lambent brushing of fingers over the titles on the bookshelf like caressing a woman's tresses? It's a difficult feeling to convey, but I think Jawaharlal Nehru came closest to it, though in an entirely different context; it bears repeating. At a formal dinner once, Nehru and Lord Mountbatten were having tandoori chicken. Nehru was eating in the Indian style, with his fingers, but Mountbatten was making heavy weather of it with knife and fork. Panditji observed the struggle for some time, could contain himself no longer and told the Viceroy: "My lord, you should use your fingers. Eating tandoori chicken with a knife and fork is like making love to a beautiful woman through an interpreter, you know!"  That is exactly what Kindle does to reading: it can make you a promiscuous reader but not a faithful or satiated one.
  Having bared my bookworm heart, however, I am now confronted with a problem as I revel in the idyllic ambience of my village these days. I have just acquired my latest tome, Ram Chandra Guha's latest opus: GANDHI: THE YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD (1914-1948). It's at no.16 of my wait listed books, and in the normal course its turn for reading should come in 2020 or 2021, about the time when Rahul Gandhi's turn for Prime Ministership should be manifesting itself. But it is all of 1129 pages and weighs about four kgs. If I wait too long I may be too weak to lift it or the Grim Reaper may knock on my doors before I finish it. I have seriously considered doing a Chetan Bhagat on it, i.e. read the first and last pages only, and instantly get the gist of all that lies in-between. But that would be worse than using an interpreter- it would be like employing a stenographer: dots and dashes can never convey the beauty of a book, or of a woman, can they? So I think I'll just give it away to Arnab Goswami- it's about time he learnt something about someone other than Mr. Modi, anyway. It will fill the yawning gaps in his education about India, but best of all it would have made Dr. Chatterjee happy: he loved to show the light to Philistines.
  

16 comments:

  1. A refreshing change while awaiting the poll outcome.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "That it must feel good to the touch; smell of paper, ink and time; fondly remind one of where and when it was bought; enable one to make notes on the margin? How does one convey the pleasure of physical possession, or the occasional lambent brushing of fingers over the titles on the bookshelf like caressing a woman's tresses?"

    Very classical and whole truth! Wonderful Sunday reading!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ref.the Goswami person - should keep him quiet for a bit too, no?.
    Had never heard of Bennett Cerf till just now. 'My bad'. Who be he and what he dood?
    Every class gets told there is the study of language and there's the loving of it. For me English is a particularly good language to love, irrespective where it comes from. Thus literature of the soul. wherever one's soul may be.
    And why you kept Shaw and Maugham and Munro and Maupassant out Boss? And O by the way Henry and Hemingway? Bias.
    What do books smell of? 'Sugar & Spice and all things nice'. Like women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BC was a great humorist and speech writer. The authors you mention are of course non- pareil and up there with the best, but most of them were part of the school syllabus ( except perhaps O Henry and Maupassant) and hence ignored by the good Doc. Indeed, women ARE like books- whodunit thrillers- but for me they are all in Latin: never could understand them!

      Delete
  4. "It's like these tomes are my capital, a kind of fixed deposit, and reading them would amount to breaking the FD and depleting this precious stock."
    I can vouch for the writer's paranoia for his books. Being a room mate, I once happened to keep his book in an open position on a table with the cover and last page facing upwards. With a muttered oath he closed the book and admonished me, "you'll RUIN the spine, you dumbo!"

    "Fortunately, this phase didn't last long, thus preventing me from becoming the head librarian in Tihar jail."

    You're mad, Shuks!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. ......but for me they are all in Latin: never could understand them!

    Boss, busy as you are, could try this new edition?

    "A GUIDE TO WOMEN'S LOGIC" (Condensed Edition) It's only 7500 pages.

    ReplyDelete
  6. When mentioning playing with the language, one is reminded of a phrase 'life saving drugs being murderously expensive' used by Khushwant Singh and while drawing parallels, one never forgets his liking for both, the book and the allegory.
    To write with a flare, one must have read tons with passion and you surely did. Kudos.
    Keep going!

    ReplyDelete
  7. A man who loans a book is a fool; one who returns a book is an even bigger fool! .... Loved reading your blog, Avay! A change from the pessimistic stuff you normally dole out ....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey, that's not fair, Pankaj- I try hard to balance the pessimistic with the stupid!

      Delete
    2. Not balance .... share! (Only in my case)

      Delete
  8. God i m so impressed reading your writingsn
    Not all the writings impress me though.....

    ReplyDelete
  9. "It's like these tomes are my capital, a kind of fixed deposit, and reading them would amount to breaking the FD and depleting this precious stock."

    For years I had been unable to define this queer trait of mine. One book picked from the reserve stock had to be replenished swiftly to maintain the reserve quantity. Thanks to you I can now explain it and not sound deranged in the process.

    Finding another soul as passionate about the physical books is like chancing upon an Indian while journeying through Antarctica. The obsession and reverence for the health of the books is rare these days.

    ReplyDelete
  10. You dont like kindle ? �� Ok it's normal everyone feel bad to change old habbits but at the end of the day the cheaper,efficient,quicker, and most environmentally friendly kindle prevail.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Loved your piece! I think we all had our Dr Chatterjees to introduce us to the Joy of Reading. I agree with all the sentiments expressed except the one about Kindle. I am at least 20 years older but have almost completely switched to that device. Reason: my strike rate for picking up good books dropped to less than half and I found difficult disposing of the trash. With Kindle one can delete those with touch of a finger.

    ReplyDelete