Monday, 22 January 2018

HIMACHAL'S TOURISM DILEMMA



     [  This piece was published in THE TRIBUNE on 21. 01. 2018 under the title MASSIVE PROBLEMS WITH MASS TOURISM. ]

The world is gradually discovering that tourism can be a double-edged sword, in that though it brings in revenues and employment it has grave social, cultural and environmental impacts. This is becoming more and more evident in Himachal. 17.50 million tourists visited the state in 2015( 2.50 times its population!) and the number is growing at 7.50% per annum, thanks partly to the unsettled conditions in Kashmir. It generates Rs. 1200 crores, about 10% of the state’s GDP. It also creates 400,000 jobs.
But the downside can no longer be ignored. Tourism in Himachal is primarily mass tourism, not the quality variety. This is evident from a McKinsey report of 2015 which found that the average per tourist spend was only Rs.600.00, and that 96% of the tourists were in the income bracket of Rs.1 to Rs. 5 lakhs per annum. Secondly, almost 50% of the visitors were concentrated in just three destinations: Kullu ( 33.15 lakhs), Shimla(32.65) and Kangra(24). The combined effect of these numbers is devastating the natural environment and leading to massive, unplanned urbanisation which has turned all the state’s towns into virtual slums. The mushrooming of sub-standard hotels, resorts,dhabas is like a cancerous scab on the beautiful mountain landscape which has now spread even to the rural areas. Rivers are being choked by garbage and plastics, trees being felled in their thousands, roads are crowded with vehicles headed nowhere, water shortages are common in a state which has a thousand streams. The infrastructure of the state is collapsing under the sheer weight of numbers. Any honest and multi-sectoral cost benefit analysis would reveal that tourism in Himachal is a losing proposition and needs a rethink at the policy level.
The state govt. has to become proactive in shaping the type of tourism and nudging it towards greater quality, rather than being satisfied with the rising numbers every year which actually portend disaster. Equally important, it has to aggressively protect and preserve its natural features, for without them there would be no tourism at all. It should consider the following initiatives:
·        Stop registration of new hotels or other hospitality units in the towns which have already exceeded their carrying capacity long ago, such as Shimla( including Mashobra), Manali, Kullu, Dharamshala, Solan, Palampur, Dalhousie. This will not only discourage the insane construction activities in these degraded urban areas but will also help to disperse the crowds to other under-fed areas of the state.
·        Connectivity has to be improved:high-end tourists will not spend five hours travelling from Chandigarh to Shimla, and the flights to Dharamsala, Manali and Shimla are irregular and exorbitantly priced. The state should invest in helicopter services, with Shimla as the hub. A proposal was floated in 2008 but has got nowhere, primarily because Shimla lacks a civilian heli-pad. Efforts by the govt. to persuade Rashtrapati Bhavan to allow the use of the Kalyani heli-pad near Charabra were rebuffed by the President’s office on “ security” grounds, even though it is not used 364 days in a year! I believe another site has been identified near Dhalli, but the proposal continues to languish in some file.
·        Revive the ambitious Ski Village proposal- a 1200 crore FDI project which would have firmly brought Himachal onto the international map- which was shot down by the Dhumal govt under the vested pressure of hoteliers in the Manali area.
·        Promote, and concentrate on, nature and adventure tourism rather than simply the “chhola bhatura” kind of commerce that passes for tourism today. With 32 Wild Life Sanctuaries, 4 unique National Parks, more than 400 Forest Rest Houses the state has unmatched potential for trekking, rafting, bird watching, mountaineering and allied sports which unfortunately is not being exploited. A reluctant Forest Department has been gradually nudged into sharing these assets by the formation of an Eco-Tourism Society some years ago, but it has to do much more. It is imperative, however, to fix the carrying capacity of each unit and strictly regulate numbers. Eco-tourism and Home stays are the way forward.
·        The govt. should stop destroying the natural environment by building more and more roads into pristine areas just so that ever increasing numbers of cars filled with people who have no concept or genuine love of nature can despoil these areas and leave their fast food garbage behind. It should not make it easier for such elements to access our natural treasures. If required, install ropeways only. It is disheartening to note that even though the three ropeways to Rohtang, Bijli Mahadev and Triund were approved almost ten years back they are nowhere near completion. Think of more ropeways, like one from Dhalli to Kufri, or Dalhousie to Khajiar, both destinations swamped by vehicles in the season; the former is additionally buried under mule dung!
Himachal needs a total paradigm shift in the way it thinks tourism and it must learn from international experiences. Tourism has become one of the biggest threats to nature and local cultures world wide. On any given day there are 3 million tourists tramping all over the world and the figure will go up to 6 million by 2025; that is 1.8 billion tourists on the loose! If not regulated or channelized properly and in time, they will be like a swarm of locusts, destroying everything worth conserving. Local populations have started reacting with hostility to tourists- in Venice, Barcelona, Thailand, Nepal, Bhutan. I am positive the permanent residents of Shimla feel the same way. They need to speak up while there is still some standing room on the Shimla Ridge.


    

3 comments:

  1. As a longtime resident of Dharamsala I can wholeheartedly agree with your view of the tourism-related problems Himachal is facing.
    McLeod Ganj and Bhagsunag are two examples of how not to do things.
    These places have changed beyond recognition in the last 20 years.
    Especially worrying is the low standard of construction of all these new hotels in a high-risk seimic zone. They are death traps. Beware. If you stay in one of these hotels you will one day go to sleep in Dharamsala and wake up in Pathankot, quite possibly a bit worse for wear.The garbage and traffic problems almost defy description.
    Hope springs eternal and there is a new government. Let's keep our fingers crossed.
    Thank you for your blog. The enlightened view from GK is always a pleasure to read and provides much food for thought !
    Alberto Marconi, Exeter, UK
    albertospark at gmx dot com

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for your comments, Alberto. I had first trekked upto Triund in 1976: it was an experience beyond description. I have been up there a couple of times again in the 90's and again in 2002 and the deterioration was already evident. Have not been there since and can imagine its state now. There is no vision or will on the part of the govt. to preserve any of our natural features. I expect nothing from the new govt.- they are all the same in their populism and short sightedness. Unfortunately ( and I hate to say this) but it will take an earthquake or other major disaster- not natural but man-made- to open the eyes of our policy makers and their minions.

    ReplyDelete