I've been a liberal arts type all my life, both by education and aptitude, and avoid numbers like Queen Camilla avoids Meghan Markel, except when the numbers come in a sequence like 36-20-34. But one has to admit that at times they make sense, in a fascinating way, and so this week I've decided to delve into some of them.
I have a good friend in Switzerland who sensibly quit the IAS and the country 40 years ago and now spends his retirement playing the alphorn to frolicking sheep on the mountain slopes. But not before sending us a Whatsapp message every morning giving us the AQI of his adopted country on that day. It usually hovers between 13 and 18. For those who are slow on the uptake, or up on the slowtake, I'll repeat that- between 13 and 18. (This figure used to be about 8 before my friend and about 16500 other Indians decided to take up residence there in preference to Malerkotla and Kotkapura). The average AQI in my NCR area is about 400. And for once this can't be passed off as a foreign conspiracy to "belittle our image" since this is our own, make in India, data.
Now, we are a Vishwaguru, the fifth largest economy in the world, ruled by the largest political party in the world, presided over by a Prime Minister who (by his own declaration) is at the forefront of the war against climate change and has even "won" international awards like Champion Of The Earth. So why is our ambient air quality 45 times worse than Switzerland's, even allowing for the fact that my Swiss friend doesn't smoke, while I do?
This question has no doubt been answered by experts, politicians, Baba Ramdev and Mr. Kejriwal, but we are still inching up to the 500 mark. Why? you may well ask, like Zelensky did when Putin frog- marched into Ukraine. Because, dear reader, no one has grasped the real reason, except me (or is it 'I' ?) The real reason, according to me, is the fact that we mistake AQI for IQ, and vice versa, and so believe that the higher the AQI, the better it is. (This, incidentally, is what happens when you ditch the Queen's English for the King's Jumla, and don't learn how to watch your ' Q's' and dot your 'I's').
After my epiphanic discovery I decided to dig deeper into this IQ business to see if there exists a co-relation between IQ and AQI, and found, to my Archimedian delight, that such a relationship does exist! But it's an inverse one- countries with lower IQs usually have higher AQIs and vice versa. Here are the figures for India , Switzerland and the top three countries of the world for good air quality (the AQI figures are for their capitals as at the time of writing this piece):
COUNTRY AQI IQ
Switzerland 13 100.4
Japan 41 112
Taiwan 38 106.47
Singapore 34 105.89
India 400 82
So there you have it, the cause and effect, the smoking gun literally. One would think that the solution to our AQI problem is now obvious- raise the average IQ of India. But that. folks, is harder than raising the Titanic.
For one, our intellectual eco-system is not conducive to that at all, and it's getting more lobotomised every day. It's hard to improve intelligence levels when students are taught that we attained our independence in 2014 and not 1947, or when we are told that Maharana Pratap won the battle of Haldighati, or when Nehru, not China, is blamed for the 1962 war, or when the govt. of the day regularly attempts to wage a linguistic colonialism on states, forgetting that the colonial age has been long dead and buried, or when Universities are sought to be turned into indoctrination centres, the "slaughter houses of intelligence", as Madhusudan Das had famously said, or when the Minister for Environment proudly claims that "India is the solution, not the problem" to tackling climate change even as he approves the diversion of 140sq. kms of evergreen rainforest land and felling of 8.50 lakh trees in Greater Nicobar for construction of a port, airport and power plant ! (Incidentally, you don't need a high IQ to guess who will get these projects). It would appear that history is indeed written by the victor, whether the victory is obtained in war, or at the hustings, or by purchasing the winning horses. But a country in continuous Derby mode does not guarantee a sound intelligence quotient. It also does not help the cause of promoting intelligence when a country reserves 60% of its jobs and college quotas (in some states it's even higher) for various castes and classes under the guise of "affirmative action", relegating merit to the back benches. Merit has now become non-merit goods, in economic parlance. As my late Professor, P.Lal, would have said- I am what I think, and if I can't think, then I am nothing.
Our rulers and "influencers" do not inject much wisdom into the ecosphere either. In fact, they do precisely the reverse and flush out what little national IQ there remains every time a Minister says that Einstein discovered gravity, or when another Minister scoffs at Darwin's theory of evolution because none of his ancestors had ever seen an ape turning into homo sapiens, or when the Finance Minister claims that the rupee has not weakened, it's the dollar which has become stronger, or when the IIT educated Mr. Kejriwal says that the rupee will recover if images of Hindu gods are printed on it. (My own personal view is that the only force which can make the rupee rise is Sunny Leone- her touch would make the dead rise in their graves- but that will not amuse the flaccid mandarins in South Block so we'll let that slide).
To conclude, therefore: I am no meteorologist or climate scientist, but I can confidently predict, like Baba Venga, that, going by the inverse theory established above (for which I generously claim no patent), our AQI will only continue to rise in the days to come. But I am not complaining. According to another set of statistics released recently in a Berkeley Earth Scientific paper, the pollution in Delhi is equivalent to smoking 20.4 cigarettes a day. After reading this I've now stopped smoking- why should I spend my money on something which the govt. is giving away for free? The savings almost make up for the denial of those three instalments of our DA during the pandemic period. As the Chief Economic Advisor would doubtless claim, Delhi's smog is revenue neutral. Or, to put it in the more easily comprehended language of our Finance Minister, our IQ is not falling, our SQ (Stupidity Quotient) is rising.
36-20-34.
ReplyDeleteThis sequence cannot be derived in number theory and sequential combinatorics.
Any more than it can physiologically, physically, ergonomically, or visually.
Not even chauvinistically.
The "aahh" and the "oomph" cannot possibly perch below and above a lumbar support so impossibly slender.
I am convinced the AQI over Delhi and Shimla has overpowered the IQ temporarily. Which establishes the inverse relation in the two metrics theorised in the blog.
Before Avay Shukla takes umbrage at my audacity, may I compliment him for using his own self as the example to validate his axiomatic inference.
Point taken, Mr Patankar. But your suspension of belief seems to be hypothetical . What about a robust pair of legs providing foundational support?
ReplyDeleteHeh heh heh smirk smirk...robust pair...& foundational support...Great!!!!
DeleteAptly commented Mr.Sen.
ReplyDeleteWhile I am in total consonance with Mr.Shukla on the more serious matter of worsening air quality and its attritional effect, this was more of a poke in the ribs than anything else. We have sparred in the past and Avay Shukla is not one to flinch from a blow. Likewise, he does not hold back his punches, many of which have bludgeoned me to the mat. Being a man worth his malt, his rye humour and keen appreciation of the fair gender paints a simile that is impossible to ignore. The Barbie Doll configurations were a tad fantastic and I saw my chance of a KO.
No disrespect meant to him who all of us are grateful for the weekly dose of fecundity. I take solace in the knowledge that the AQI over Mumbai is responsible for my acute paucity of IQ which has been rendered irreversible.
"...worth his malt...(and) rye humour..." hahaha... brilliant!
DeleteIf it elicits a response from Kabir Mustafi, it passes the litmus test. Thank you.
DeleteAllow me to enjoy both of your delightful sparring till my humour by pass .
ReplyDelete😂 Epiphanic, indeed! 🤣
ReplyDeleteThank you for invoking the closing words of that eponymous movie:
"Does it hurt?"
"Only when I larf."
Wonderfully written piece. It reflects the reality of life in India. It is beyond me as why our so called leaders and policy maker are turning away their attention from the problems of the country and its people. We are so suppressed in social and economical cauldron and are busy in making both ends meet. We are actually waiting for Catastrophe to happen.
ReplyDeleteHighlighting an unscientific, highly variable and racist concept like the IQ to address the AQI really misses the point this time. The table inserting made it even more tone deaf, imo.
ReplyDeleteAbhay ji has tried to prove that low IQ is related to higher AQI. But by his own figures Japan's higher IQ but AQI is higher than Switzerland's which has lower IQ lower AQI. Abhay ji is proved wrong. He could have compared India to China or Brazil to show a comparitive picture. It would, in any case, be interesting to know. Further he says that the AQI of India is 400 which is a wrong statement. The average figure is not the figure of Delhi or Kolkata
ReplyDeleteWhat a delightful read. As to the reality of AQI across our metros, the less said the better.
ReplyDeleteLoved every bit of the AQI and IQ and the sparring it triggered off... Wish such instant value addition was possible to our O2 as well...
ReplyDeleteCat among pigeons? Bystander at Fair Ground watching the Merry Go Round ? One of the great things about your blog, Avay, is that it continues to draw sustenance from the civility, erudition and general knowledge of your ever expanding follow-ship. There could be, I notice of late, one or two offerings which betray a minor struggle with comprehension and therefore with expression; but the View from Greater Kailash continues to be snow & avalanche worthy.
ReplyDeleteThank you, Kabir, for your regular encouragement and your observation. One of the joys of this blog site is the wealth of astute responses from the readers, and the additional wit, penetrating responses and sparkling exchanges the pieces engender. The occasional disagreements (and admonitions from Mr. Patankar !) are also educative. Last week my blog registered its millionth hit, so I now consider myself a millionaire in the only currency that matters at this ripening age!
ReplyDeleteHearty felicitations on attaining the coveted number of hits.The stratospheric figure testifies to the ever-increasing popularity of your blog that has lasted over time and continues to enrich people week after week. This is the true Mann ki Baat which presents a perspective and awaits response from every quarter, regardless of the emotions it stirs.
ReplyDeleteOne million! That's ten lakhs in our language Avay. Fantastic.
ReplyDeleteWarmest congratulations. Long may you continue to entertain & ensnare. But more importantly provoke a frequently indifferent authority to act on the side of right.
God bless.