Add this

Friday, 4 July 2025

OVERTOURISM AND UNDER-PLANNING

 

                                  

The Deputy Commissioner Shimla announced last Tuesday that 300,000 vehicles had entered Shimla in the last two weeks due to the tourist rush. That is 15000 vehicles per day. Shimla has parking for just about 5000 vehicles, and if we assume that a tourist family/group stays for just two days, the daily parking requirement is for 30000 vehicles- six times what is available. (This does not include the locally registered vehicles numbering about 70000!)

The situation is no different in Dehradun, Nainital, Mussoorie, Manali, Dharamshala and other hill stations. And it’s getting worse every year.

The tourists, of course, suffer, stuck in jams for hours, sometimes for nights, without food, water or toilet facilities. Half their vacation time is spent on the roads. The real and continuing price, however, is paid by the permanent residents of these once quiet, idyllic, British-era towns, who are practically imprisoned in their houses for half the year, with no space left on the roads even for walking. I live near Mashobra, about 12 kms from Shimla for six months every year, and have decided to never, but NEVER, drive into Shimla during my stay here-there’s no telling if I’ll ever be able to make it back to my house!

States like Himachal and Uttarakhand bear the brunt of this vehicle-driven overtourism; their proximity to the northern states is their undoing, while Kashmir is spared the deluge because of its distance and the on-again, off-again security situation there.

The state governments should have foreseen this, with tourist numbers growing by 43% ( 2023 figure over the previous year),rising incomes, and the desperation of families to escape the heat and pollution of our deteriorating cities. But the govts never planned for this nightmare, content with collecting their GST and Luxury taxes. And when they did start making some plans, they were all the wrong ones.

 

The biggest planning blunder has been the construction of expensive, environmentally disastrous four-lane highways and expressways in the mountainous terrain of Himachal and Uttarakhand to reduce driving time and make access easier for tourists. This has led to an explosion in the number of vehicles coming to these destinations: before the Kalka-Shimla four-lane highway was built (it is still not complete) the average number of cars entering Shimla every day was about 4000 to 5000- it is now 15000 to 20000. And when these vehicles enter Shimla there is just no space for them to park. It’s even worse in Manali, with 25000 vehicles crossing the Atal tunnel (below Rohtang pass) every day during peak season. The state govt. is a silent spectator: it took the National Green Tribunal to impose a daily cap of 1500 vehicles for the Rohtang pass to prevent it from becoming another Karol Bagh, in more ways than one.

The Shimla and Manali mistake is now being repeated, with Mussoorie being the victim this time. A 26 km elevated expressway has been approved to connect Dehradun and Mussorie: we are told this shall reduce the driving time to just 26 minutes. This is a disaster in the making, even without the 17000 trees that will be felled and the 250 families who shall be displaced by the project. The Shimla/ Manali experience shows that the number of vehicles headed for Mussoorie shall triple or quadruple; what happens to them once they reach Mussoorie? The town has even less parking space than Shimla, and can barely accommodate those who come just to meet Ruskin Bond!

Bureaucracies are loath to think out of the box, and politicians are happy to sanction capital intensive projects like roads and multi-storeyed parkings to their favoured contractors. But this comfortable, parabiotic arrangement has to change: given the geology and terrain, one cannot keep “widening” roads and excavating more parking spaces indefinitely, and the limits have already been reached. What our mountain destinations need are fewer highways and more cable/ rope-ways- that way they can keep getting more tourists but fewer vehicles. A Dehradun-Mussoorie cable system would have served the purpose of the elevated highway, with no addition of vehicles, at one tenth of the elevated highway cost. It is to Himachal’s credit that it has seen the light and has approved four major rope-way projects: Parwanoo-Shimla, Dharamshala-McLeodganj, Manali-Rohtang, and Kullu-Bijli Mahadev. Many more are needed, including one from Parwanoo/Kalka to Kasauli.

The Union government too needs to play a role in curbing this vehicular overtourism. It should NEVER AGAIN approve a monstrosity like the Char Dham Highway which is effectively a death warrant for Kedarnath, Badrinath, Gangotri and Yamunotri. It should put a hold on all four laning projects in these states (even at the risk of annoying Mr. Gadkari) and fast track central approvals and funding for ropeways. More flights should be started to these states- in Himachal currently all its four airports are being utilized at below 50% of their capacity.

More helicopter services should be introduced, and not just to religious places. Most important, the govt. should expand the skeletal rail network in all mountain states which have tourism potential, and not just for strategic reasons. In 75 years not an inch of rail line has been added to what the British left behind. This shall not only reduce the vehicular tsunamis in the mountains but shall also add an entirely novel experience for the visitors.

Harsh physical or fiscal barriers such as e-passes, capping numbers of vehicles entering a state or even excessive tolls or entry fees should be avoided as they cause inconvenience and will not serve the purpose in the long run. It is better to provide the tourist an attractive alternative to using his car rather than simply taxing him or embroiling him in red tape. The lazy solution is usually the worst. ( Though these tough measures will become inevitable if the numbers continue to expand at the present rate).

The vision should be: we welcome tourists, but not their cars.

(This piece was published in The Times of India on the 21st of June 2025 under the caption "Tourists Welcome, Not Their Cars.")

6 comments:

  1. Seems we have reached the limit in these hills. No practical solution seems to be in sight. All towns in Himachal should levy a car / 4 wheeler tax of ₹ 1000/- per day - we can only discourage vehicles. There is no room to build parking anymore. Rope ways should be encouraged on war footing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I share your concern Sir...too disappointed to see the rising temperatures and our pristine hill station losing it's charm .
    The last 20 years have been quite disturbing . There are very few untouched valleys ,places but for past two -three years there were not as pleasant to visit as just a few years back,thanks to the internet almost everyone has access to these remote places .

    Global warming and local factors are impacting . Rains do give some relief by temporarily creating the atmosphere of mist , floating clouds but the extreme climate events are dangerous in their own ways.

    Thanks for sharing your views-insightful as always.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Tourists travelling in own cars is something to be done away with. It is a shame none of governments after 75 of independence could implement a single kilometer of railway line added in Himachal Pradesh. Cable cars is something to be developed more and Himachal should be commended for it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. While most people only complain,
    here is s solution.
    1. Demarcate 'no vehicle zones' and let property owners erect vertical parking towers to facilitate paid parking spaces at reasonable rates outside these zones
    2.Allow hotels and motels to build staying facilities.
    3.Permit share taxis to operate in the no vehicle zones at reasonable rates.
    4.Do proper road marking to prevent haphazard parking.
    5.Ensure good and sensible enforcement..

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is somewhat mystifying that Mr. Shukla did not direct his political masters towards the concept of cable cars during his prime time as Additional Chief Secretary. Having headed HP Road Transport Corporation, he would have formed a reliable estimate of the shortcomings of surface transport in the face of the sloping geography. Additionally, having trekked extensively across the length and breadth of the state to know every cairn, moraine, and ridge, he must have envisioned the need of an alternative mode of locomotion. Had cable cars criss-crossed Himachal instead of the expressways, the situation may have been far more manageable today. Perhaps Mr. Shukla and other officers who have retired permanently to the mountains are paying for their past silence, in the present, by being foisted with honking vehicles and euphoric revellers in the summer, when the state should be at its best and most sanguine. Perhaps the visitors are suffering just as badly, having to spend hours in the incessant jams and piling frustration.
    To wish for tourists but not their vehicles is akin to taking their money without providing them its worth. Give them a travel solution in the form of electric buses for intra-state travel; electric trams for town hopping; electric midget cars like the E-Nano for navigating the labyrinths of the quaint towns. Then the outsiders can be reproached for driving in with their private vehicles.
    Till the current crop of intelligent bureaucrats comes up with innovative answers, Mr. Shukla and others will have to regret the reticence of their past when they could have made a difference to their state and its people. And the present droves of hapless, incoming tourists.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Vishwas Patankar.

    ReplyDelete